学生对 Google 提供的 Think Outside the Inbox: Email Marketing 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
SD
Oct 3, 2022
The concept of email marketing was completely new to me. The tutor in this course has gracefully explained different aspects of email marketing. I am extremely happy to gain this unique knowledge.
DJ
Oct 30, 2022
The concept of email marketing was completely new to me. The tutor in this course has gracefully explained different aspects of email marketing. I am extremely happy to gain this unique knowledge.
551 - Think Outside the Inbox: Email Marketing 的 575 个评论(共 604 个)
创建者 Zeeshan N
•Feb 5, 2023
good to learn about .. gaining knowledge
创建者 Amber R
•Sep 27, 2023
Would like more data analysis practice
创建者 Lizbeth E S V
•Aug 24, 2025
Seria un formato completo en español
创建者 Robiul C
•Aug 14, 2024
Need more real life practice session
创建者 CLAUDIA S R F
•Jun 11, 2023
Thanks a lot. I liked it very much!
创建者 MARIA C L S S
•Jun 29, 2025
melhorar o cusera para os alunosa
创建者 RAHUL P
•Sep 14, 2022
It was a good learning experience
创建者 Smita S
•Jun 16, 2023
Great content and collaborative!
创建者 Arnold M
•May 20, 2024
it is a great course
创建者 mikael a
•Jul 20, 2024
It's was amazing
创建者 Nag R D
•Oct 8, 2023
It was good
创建者 AM t
•Feb 25, 2023
good to go!
创建者 Bhavya S
•Sep 23, 2022
Insightful
创建者 Rosemary l
•May 19, 2023
enjoyed it
创建者 BARBARA D
•Jan 18, 2025
excellent
创建者 Sani E Z
•Jan 8, 2024
great one
创建者 Ridhi S
•Dec 7, 2022
thanks
创建者 Zaky A
•Sep 16, 2024
Good
创建者 Mohammed I
•Oct 13, 2022
good
创建者 Abdulrahman W
•Jan 10, 2024
جيد
创建者 Linda K
•Oct 20, 2022
.
创建者 Susanna K
•Nov 5, 2022
Good outline but there are inconsistencies. And it was infuriating to have a question and not know where to go. Perhaps I'm missing out on the part in this course where you can ask a question and actually get an answer.
CTOR is it "unique clicks" or "clicks" I posed this question in multiple places and was never given an answer. If an email contains several CTA, or a person clicks several times on the email, what counts? how is "number of clicks" tracked? I believe it's one click per person, or "if a person clicks through an email it's counted as ONE click". I'm guessing. Sometimes the use of "Unique clicks" and "clicks" was used as the same thing.
Also, in the quiz I had a hard time distinguishing between some Specific, Measurable questions. Determining whether it was Demographic, Psychographic or Behavioral. referring me "back to the video" did not help much. And giving the answers missed once we passed would be helpful. I'm missing the distinction between Psychographic and Behavioral when different examples are given. I'm still not certain.
创建者 Tarek A
•Apr 22, 2025
Out of all the courses in the Google Digital Marketing & E-commerce certificate, this one didn’t quite hit the mark for me. Email marketing isn’t a topic I found myself connecting with, and that lack of interest made it harder to stay engaged. The content felt dense, and some concepts were challenging to grasp, especially without more current or relatable examples. The quizzes and assignments were on the stricter side, too—not impossible, but more challenging than I expected. Another issue was that some examples and resources were not as up-to-date as they should have been, especially considering how fast digital marketing evolves. When a course emphasises staying current, outdated links and case studies can be frustrating. Overall, it was informative, and I appreciate the effort behind it, but it was not a course I particularly enjoyed or would be eager to revisit.
创建者 Jessica J
•Feb 21, 2024
While this course had some practical elements, it seemed far too focused on the language and jargon used to measure and interpret email marketing success. I work in a small organization and no one I work with uses most of this language, so the intense focus on that was kind of useless to me (e.g., I've had to explain the difference between pageviews and unique pageviews on our website to colleagues before...having to explain all the different "rates" that can measure emails is just not going to happen). I wish there was less focus on vocabulary and more on best practices.