Chevron Left
返回到 Introduction to Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

学生对 Johns Hopkins University 提供的 Introduction to Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 的评价和反馈

4.8
3,520 个评分

课程概述

We will introduce methods to perform systematic reviews and meta-analysis of clinical trials. We will cover how to formulate an answerable research question, define inclusion and exclusion criteria, search for the evidence, extract data, assess the risk of bias in clinical trials, and perform a meta-analysis. Upon successfully completing this course, participants will be able to: - Describe the steps in conducting a systematic review - Develop an answerable question using the “Participants Interventions Comparisons Outcomes” (PICO) framework - Describe the process used to collect and extract data from reports of clinical trials - Describe methods to critically assess the risk of bias of clinical trials - Describe and interpret the results of meta-analyses...

热门审阅

PS

Aug 22, 2019

Introduction to Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis course is a very good source for beginners which provides an overview on fundamental terminology and steps involved in the systematic review.

MJ

Jan 7, 2019

Although introductory, I do carry out reviews as a researcher. I Learned a lot to improve my systematic reviews through this course. High quality, though the music could be a little less intense.

筛选依据:

901 - Introduction to Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 的 922 个评论(共 922 个)

创建者 ARNOLD T C

Dec 11, 2023

wery well

创建者 Marlene F E M

Oct 22, 2021

Excelent!

创建者 RAMYASHREE

Aug 30, 2023

Good

创建者 Ankit B

Mar 22, 2023

good

创建者 Harshitha B

Jan 7, 2022

Good

创建者 Abd a R

Apr 5, 2022

创建者 Ziad s

Sep 2, 2024

the course lacks the experimental part,after completing the course I can't do ca systematic review and meta-analysis on my own. Also thec ourse didn't emphasize on the how to quality assessment for included studies or how to actually get all the studies, it only gives you framework from the cochrane handbook and you should do everything on your own. So I would recommend that others should know how to do systematic review and then take this course this way they will understand it.

创建者 R K S

May 8, 2021

The Course is engaging and adds value to the learner. It has added many new phrases in my vocabulary pertaining to SR and MA. However, course focusses the medical professionals which needs to be mentioned in the introduction of the course.

It adds good cognitive knowledge but builds skills less. Some practising assignments would further add value to learners and the course.

创建者 Muoneke c v

May 25, 2023

Hello cousera, i'm elated to be part of this wonderful course. The peer review assessment is incomplete. I keep flagging it down and it is preventing me from finishing up .

What could be the problem?

创建者 Simin A

May 9, 2025

Although it was an excellent opportunity to enroll, I was unable to submit the assignments due to my inability to pay the fee.

创建者 Suisin L

Apr 26, 2018

Me gustó el curso, solo que al final, me perdí. Desde que empezó con el meta análisis.

创建者 N.A. T

Feb 27, 2017

Great content, but not delivered in a very dynamic manner so hard to stay attentive.

创建者 Despina P

Dec 5, 2025

A bit outdated, a good idea is a more interactive course

创建者 vdk

Jun 21, 2018

need more developement on network meta analysis, etc..

创建者 Taima F

Jan 26, 2020

It's good but I felt bored in some lectures !!!

创建者 María M V

Jun 4, 2017

Important in medical practice

创建者 Ahmad A

May 28, 2017

there was no notes

创建者 Chengwei C

Dec 12, 2025

It seems like some of the courses are not available on Coursera. I was excited about the introduction of statistical software, but they're missing. Very disappointed.

创建者 Whinsky U

Jul 22, 2025

Asking me to pay for a course you have listed as free is nuts. Why can't I move to the next without upgrading to submit?

创建者 Omir A

Oct 5, 2018

Need more explination in real website, and explination of terms

创建者 Rebecca L

Jun 5, 2020

I thought it wasnt that great quality.

创建者 Gayatri D

Sep 13, 2022

i recorrected my assignment but still they didnt review my submission

my hardwork is lost