学生对 Johns Hopkins University 提供的 Introduction to Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
KA
Feb 12, 2017
Incredible course! You learned a lot from these amazing professors. If you take this course you will know how to do a high quality systematic review and even a meta analysis and publish them.
AM
May 14, 2020
Very straightforward course. The only issue I found is the last lecture in week 5 suggests there is still more content to be learnt, but there isn't. Maybe they removed some videos overtime.
751 - Introduction to Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 的 775 个评论（共 924 个）
创建者 shiva s
•Dec 3, 2025
Great
创建者 Adithi P
•Nov 3, 2025
goood
创建者 Яковлева В А
•Jan 7, 2025
Nice!
创建者 QUINTERO A A
•Nov 30, 2021
good
创建者 Ramu V
•May 8, 2020
great
创建者 Adam O
•Nov 27, 2016
Great
创建者 Mahesh D
•May 28, 2025
GOOD
创建者 Dr. V B
•Nov 25, 2020
good
创建者 Mangali M
•Sep 29, 2020
good
创建者 Mona A A
•Sep 26, 2020
good
创建者 gabriela s
•Sep 3, 2020
good
创建者 illona w
•Apr 27, 2020
good
创建者 Ahmed B
•Apr 9, 2019
Grea
创建者 Angela
•Aug 26, 2016
Good
创建者 vito p
•Oct 20, 2025
top
创建者 Edison M
•Feb 5, 2018
Exc
创建者 Yamile C S C
•Jun 22, 2019
OK
创建者 Zeynab R
•Nov 16, 2025
-
创建者 Yarisbeth Q
•Aug 31, 2021
.
创建者 Zahra N
•Aug 6, 2021
创建者 Amani
•Mar 10, 2020
T
创建者 GINA K S R
•Jan 23, 2020
.
创建者 Hayley F
•Sep 1, 2020
Overall, I enjoyed the course, and as someone who has read systemic reviews but not undertaken them, I feel that I have learned a lot. The course is not perfect - some of the information presented is out of date, with the videos appearing to be at least five years old. Much of the course is underpinned by reviews which determined how to optimize systematic reviews, and it is likely that more is now known than when the videos were made. The age of the course also meant that the quoted sections of the Cochrane Handbook are several editions out of date, and the module on search strategies included screenshots of PubMed's old interface rather than the new 2020 interface. However, the underlying principles for both the Cochrane Handbook and PubMed are the same, so this didn't detract too much from the course. The three instructors had varying presentation styles, with one tending to read every word on the slide. Luckily an engaging speaker delivered the majority of the videos.
创建者 Felicitas d C
•Aug 24, 2020
Learned a lot about meta-analysis and systematic reviews. Module 8 took it for granted that everyone has had epidemiology and statistical courses that are used in the module. The course is not only for public health students and professionals but also other members of various disciplines.
There should be an optional module on the basics of the statistical procedures for module 8 for non-public health course attendees. This additional (optional) module will facilitate the use of the statistical procedures mentioned in module 8.
创建者 Bob B
•Sep 12, 2022
Came into the course knowing a fair bit already. The course is a bit dated, using past editions of the Cochrane Handwook and Borenstein's Intro to Meta-Analysis. Nonetheless, I really learned a lot about a process of inquiry that I have had an interest in for decades. The qualitative (bias) stuff I appreciate the most and the historical studies that informed that area of Systematic Reviews . Much more to learn but I don't expect I will regret taking this overview course.