学生对 Kennesaw State University 提供的 Six Sigma Tools for Define and Measure 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
JW
Jun 11, 2020
Quick and efficient presentation of material with good surface-level rules of thumb that should serve the majority of people in the majority of instances. This is very effectively delivered.
SB
Sep 18, 2024
This was really informative and interesting. I was able to finish this without any circumstances because the arrangement of the course modules and quizzes. It was really fun learning here.
376 - Six Sigma Tools for Define and Measure 的 400 个评论（共 402 个）
创建者 Mohamed S
•Dec 10, 2019
you need in this part more clarifications and practical examples to make it more easier for us
创建者 Albin A C C
•Sep 27, 2022
I really didn´t like the 1st and 4th week professor. The overall its ok.
创建者 Dishank M B
•Aug 16, 2020
Subtitles were not matching and method of presentation can be improved
创建者 Álvaro
•Feb 24, 2019
Doesnt provide the textual material; the subtitles are offsync
创建者 时富宽
•Sep 8, 2019
some subscript are not in the same speed with the video.
创建者 Dwayne S
•Oct 31, 2019
The statistic section should have more visual examples.
创建者 Edmundo E
•Nov 3, 2020
lecture is monotonous. student cant easily drift.
创建者 Mike A
•Aug 11, 2025
There are modules that has little to no sounds.
创建者 Thelma F T A
•Jul 8, 2020
A lot of words in the presentation.
创建者 Ilia B
•Sep 6, 2022
too superficial, little practice
创建者 Mahboubeh N M
•Feb 14, 2018
I think more detail was required
创建者 Amitha T
•Jun 17, 2022
not my favorite subject
创建者 andrea
•Sep 22, 2025
a lot of text
创建者 Erik M
•Jul 24, 2020
Too easy.
创建者 Junaid K
•Aug 11, 2020
Good
创建者 Erik B
•Dec 10, 2025
Module 4 was particularly bad. The video audio kept repeating and the transcript repeated the same sentence multiple times. Then the quizzes asked questions that were presumably about the information that would have been shared had the audio not been messed up. Additionally, many of the questions in the quizzes were outright silly. The wrong answers were so blatantly wrong you could give the quiz to someone who hadn't taken one minute of the course, and they would be able to pass
创建者 Marina B
•Jan 14, 2021
Not very structured, too theoretical and not interactive at all. As want to get maximum knowledge of time I spend here I had to read again their sophisticated formulations, try to get the most important points - and it is very boring and not easy. A quiz is usually helping to search the answers and to repeat the material - here it is not the case as the answers are too obvious and stupid. What a shame
创建者 Moataz A
•Jun 13, 2021
The course relies too much on reading the book. Which is not why we took the course. If we wanted to read the book we could've.
The instructors' presentations are very vague and all they do is just read what's written there... There is no practical assignments or hands-on training.
Overall, the course and the specialization is very weak.
创建者 Rupam S
•May 22, 2020
The course actually tells us to purchase the book. We don't pay money to just know the name of the book. Please try to increase the lecture time so that we can note down more things without purchasing the book.
创建者 Stefan V
•Aug 20, 2020
I know it was for a very basic audience, but many of the quizes' answer options were just outright idiotic and childish. Raising the bar wouldn't be a bad thing to do.
创建者 Alex G B
•Jun 3, 2020
A bit more engaging than the last course, but the questions are oddly phrased and there are multiple technically correct answers on some of the quizzes.
创建者 Mateus M
•Oct 18, 2019
They didn't think the course through, there're no connector elements between topics and the modules don't dig deep into the aplicability of the tools.
创建者 Bharath N P
•Sep 5, 2021
The Study Materials are not properly uploaded to correct portion. Some of them is missing
创建者 Nader G
•Dec 27, 2020
Lacks details and actual implementation training
创建者 Kunwar V
•Apr 26, 2024
Why I have to pay for courses as well as for subscription to complete my courses. This is very bad.