学生对 Kennesaw State University 提供的 Six Sigma Tools for Define and Measure 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
JW
Jun 11, 2020
Quick and efficient presentation of material with good surface-level rules of thumb that should serve the majority of people in the majority of instances. This is very effectively delivered.
SB
Sep 18, 2024
This was really informative and interesting. I was able to finish this without any circumstances because the arrangement of the course modules and quizzes. It was really fun learning here.
351 - Six Sigma Tools for Define and Measure 的 375 个评论(共 402 个)
创建者 Yue L
•May 2, 2020
Clear but not specific enough
创建者 Husam A A
•Jun 21, 2021
Amazing added value course
创建者 Wei P
•Jan 14, 2019
Data section is too simple
创建者 Josef M J A
•Jul 24, 2018
Informative and organized.
创建者 Aditi N
•Jun 30, 2020
Great source of learning
创建者 jehan a
•Nov 4, 2020
It usfel and helpful
创建者 Rakesh T
•Sep 4, 2020
Good Course to Learn
创建者 Alaa E A
•Aug 25, 2022
Very Good organized
创建者 Toluwanimi J L
•Jul 27, 2022
well-detailed.
创建者 sricourse1 G
•Apr 6, 2019
Great Course !
创建者 An N
•Apr 28, 2022
informative
创建者 PADOLE V B
•Aug 29, 2020
Good course
创建者 Sandesh P L ( R - R L
•Jun 29, 2021
Good
创建者 Sriram P
•Mar 9, 2019
good
创建者 Jaap P
•Sep 27, 2024
I am providing a rating for the entire Yellow Belt Specialization, which consists of four courses. This review covers the entire specialization, not just a single course. Compared to other, newer courses on Coursera, I would rate this specialization three stars. Often, the content feels like a blur of information. The instructors are only visible at the beginning, likely reading from a script. Some even pause awkwardly when turning to the next page. There is a lack of emphasis on key points, no examples to illustrate concepts, and no repetition to reinforce important information. Additionally, there is no summarizing at the end of the lessons. The slides presented are outdated and often irrelevant to the spoken content. From a didactic perspective, this course has significant room for improvement. However, the quality varies between instructors. I particularly liked Dr. Bailey and Dr. Scherrer, but the majority did not meet my expectations. Despite these issues, I completed the course and believe it provides a solid foundation. Compared to other Yellow Belt courses, which can be as short as a few hours, this specialization offers a more comprehensive basis for advancing to Green and Black Belt levels.
创建者 Derek T
•Nov 15, 2020
Useful course which provides the student with several good tools but the quality of the video lectures is poor with the lecturer having to re-read mistakes. Also, the formulation of the quiz questions (where sometimes a double negative question is asked) is not conducive to a good learner experience.
创建者 Anastasia K
•Aug 20, 2021
Weeks 1 and 4 were very hard to follow, not because they were difficult, but due to the presentation style. The optional quizzes popped in before the thoughts were concluded. Many test questions and answers for these two weeks were poorly worded. I would prefer a style that enhances retention.
创建者 Jorge T R
•Jul 31, 2020
The course doesn't provide too much information. It is based in a book you should have to follow the contents in the course. Contents are not too much developed in the videos. I miss more implication from the teachers to explain concepts and provide examples and analogies.
创建者 vishal g
•Jun 20, 2020
The offered course is really simple and easy to understand. Having said that, I have had experienced in-depth courses on the same topic on other online course platforms at a cheaper price. So, Overall not satisfied with the value for money.
创建者 Rasool E
•May 5, 2020
Week 2 with mathematical tests and practices was the most useful and memorable one to me. other topics were just presented briefly with little examples and therefore won't stay in mind for long.
创建者 Tanpreet
•Jan 1, 2021
The content on the slides from professor Cook was not inline to what he was speaking. There were topics on the slide which were not discussed in details.
创建者 nicolas b
•Oct 27, 2020
There are a lot of tools that were mentioned in this course but weren't given a proper or more in depth explanation than it should have.
创建者 JLP
•Sep 12, 2019
This course does not take 4 weeks, especially if you don't have access to the reading material. 3-4h are enough to complete it.
创建者 Shailesh K
•Apr 18, 2020
An e-book should have been provided and the lectures can be some better. It is not so engaging.