A lot of repetitive sections. Minus the fluff sections, this was an interesting course that dove into historical and psychological processes.

The Lesseons was great, but it wasn’t accurate and some very slow, non-aggregating cases and some week 5 links were out of date

Useful content but a very boring teaching style... Needs a better rhythm and more dynamic exercises to practice what you learn.

I was disappointed with the level of grammar and sentence construction in the quiz and assignment sections.

A handful of useful information, however all of them were lectured in superficial manner.

Although it is usefull I would like to have more practical cases and real-life examples.

some charts on the presentation would be a good reinforcement to the course information.

Not a particular engaging course, and not helped by typos in notes.

Informative.

Did only the quizes and still passed the course - not a very high level

It is a great course, but I thought that I would get a certificate.

Not as good, engaging, or thorough as University of Michigan's.

Plenty of great information that will help in the work area.

навыки структурирования процесса управления командой

went over a lot of stuff that is common knowledge

very engaging course. I learned a lot.

صعبة جدا لمن لم يتقن اللغة الانجليزية

A bit too uninteresting and too basic

Me hizo falta mas herramientas

Can I get a certificate?

great

good.

Good

This course was my first in Coursera. I have to say that the format is really good, with a mixture of videos, papers to read and quiz. But in this case, not all was good, and I think there is a huge lack of organization. In particular, there were a lot of paper so long and complicated. Probably it would be better to integrate/divide with some videos. Also I found some parts very academic: why we should remember all the pubblication so detailed? In the end I found less praticatal then expected. I will not buy the certificate, I am sorry.

Can't recommend this course.

It rarely manages to fill concepts with practical or real life implementations and examples.

Reading material is sometimes laughably bad, always provided with no clear objective as to what the aim is (one chapter links to an almost 200 page document). Videos contain outtakes and leave the impression that the first take that wasn't completely jinxed was used. Material contains many typos and generally leaves the impression of being quickly thrown together.

If you are experienced or with some economics background much of the stuff is very basic knowledge (Utility Theory, Behavioral Economics..).

The course might be interesting, but too many basic concepts made it boring as most of them were already known.

Also I believe that it gets most of the old behaviours of traditional universities: a lot of theory, very small orientation to practice.

It was not the actionable course that I was looking for.