学生对 L&T EduTech 提供的 Structural scheme setting and ETABS Analysis of RCC Building 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
SH
Jun 15, 2025
very conceptual and professional course but some videos missing on foundation design
NE
Jul 24, 2024
Better if foundation design and global stability check for sliding and overturning added to this course. Thanking you Sir
1 - Structural scheme setting and ETABS Analysis of RCC Building 的 9 个评论(共 9 个)
创建者 NIRVIGHNA E
•Jul 25, 2024
Better if foundation design and global stability check for sliding and overturning added to this course. Thanking you Sir
创建者 Jhunior M A v
•Dec 1, 2025
me parece un buen curso con muchos factores buenos que ayudan a entender el modelado de etabs
创建者 Safi S
•Aug 9, 2025
Coursera is the best platform for always knew something.
创建者 Gilber F M P
•Dec 1, 2025
excelente
创建者 Shakir U
•May 27, 2025
amazing
创建者 ANEKHA S
•Dec 9, 2024
good
创建者 Saeed H
•Jun 16, 2025
very conceptual and professional course but some videos missing on foundation design
创建者 Ashok Y
•Dec 24, 2025
The course content on ETABS and RCC design is practical and valuable, but multiple errors in quiz questions and answers significantly impact the learning experience. Q&A Error Example: Question 14 asks: "The K4 factor while calculating Design wind speed is _____." The marked correct answer is "Importance factor for the cyclonic region" with the explanation stating "The importance factor is denoted by I and is related to the significance of the structure... It is not specifically denoted by K4." This is contradictory and incorrect. According to IS 875 (Part 3), K4 is indeed the "Importance factor for cyclonic region" - but the explanation itself states it's denoted by "I", not "K4". The question, answer, and explanation are internally inconsistent. Similar errors appear throughout multiple modules where correct answers are marked wrong, or explanations contradict the selected answer. Positives: Strong practical focus on structural scheme development and ETABS workflows Content applicable to real-world projects Bottom Line: I successfully applied the concepts to a live G+4 project, but had to cross-verify quiz answers with IS codes independently. L&T EduTech needs urgent quality control for assessments. Recommended for: Engineers who can focus on video content and verify answers using design codes.
创建者 SWASTIK G
•May 17, 2025
For free it is good!! But paying full price is not worth it.