Name: Music as Biology: What We Like to Hear and Why
Brand: Duke University
Availability: OnlineOnly
Rating: 4.3 (183 reviews)

返回到 Music as Biology: What We Like to Hear and Why

学生对 Duke University 提供的 Music as Biology: What We Like to Hear and Why 的评价和反馈

4.3

星

727 个评分

课程概述

The course will explore the tone combinations that humans consider consonant or dissonant, the scales we use, and the emotions music elicits, all of which provide a rich set of data for exploring music and auditory aesthetics in a biological framework. Analyses of speech and musical databases are consistent with the idea that the chromatic scale (the set of tones used by humans to create music), consonance and dissonance, worldwide preferences for a few dozen scales from the billions that are possible, and the emotions elicited by music in different cultures all stem from the relative similarity of musical tonalities and the characteristics of voiced (tonal) speech. Like the phenomenology of visual perception, these aspects of auditory perception appear to have arisen from the need to contend with sensory stimuli that are inherently unable to specify their physical sources, leading to the evolution of a common strategy to deal with this fundamental challenge....

176 - Music as Biology: What We Like to Hear and Why 的 183 个评论（共 183 个）

创建者 Richard G

•

Dec 1, 2019

Very dull lecturers. Most material is poorly presented

创建者 Joao P R d S

•

May 12, 2017

too boring

创建者 Jon B

•

Sep 29, 2018

创建者 Jennifer E

•

Jun 17, 2016

I felt more like I was part of some experiment to see how long I could tolerate boredom than that I was in class where someone was trying to share knowledge with me. Needless to say I did not make it to the end which is sad because I was genuinely interested in the content. The instructor's delivery was absolutely monotone and he did not seem to emphasize the key points in any way so I found it very difficult to retain any information or to even stay awake at times.

创建者 Deleted A

•

Jun 21, 2016

I slogged through it and got an 89, but the videos were boring and the quizzes were poorly worded and should have had greater correlation with the course content.