学生对 University of London 提供的 Global Diplomacy – Diplomacy in the Modern World 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
SS
May 28, 2020
Great course. I had a general interest in diplomacy and wanted a little taste of what it was, this course has provided me just that. It has amazing resources to help enhance our knowledge of diplomacy
IZ
Jan 4, 2023
Excellent pace and decent efforts required for assignments. Course is well crafted, not boring but it could be made a little bit more interactive with online MCQs based while on the go quizzes.
1276 - Global Diplomacy – Diplomacy in the Modern World 的 1300 个评论(共 1,577 个)
创建者 Shane M
•Dec 31, 2021
Nice
创建者 Ali M H
•Dec 11, 2021
good
创建者 Muhammad t a
•Sep 26, 2021
good
创建者 Osama s h a
•Jan 12, 2021
Good
创建者 Suprotik C
•Aug 12, 2020
Good
创建者 Mona A A
•Jun 4, 2020
good
创建者 jovanna H
•Feb 11, 2017
good
创建者 Hidayatullah i
•Dec 26, 2016
Good
创建者 Nazilə M
•Feb 3, 2026
5/5
创建者 Бисенбаева К А
•Jul 24, 2025
Тиг
创建者 AASHNA R
•Apr 29, 2025
yes
创建者 José Y G
•Jul 9, 2023
exe
创建者 Фот Н С
•Jun 1, 2017
вам
创建者 Асемов М Ж у
•Nov 20, 2024
,,
创建者 Wadha A A
•Aug 15, 2022
,
创建者 Vardah I
•Jul 30, 2020
👍
创建者 Badria a h
•Feb 22, 2023
-
创建者 mahima k
•Oct 22, 2022
创建者 KEN
•Aug 31, 2022
O
创建者 Beatriz C
•Jul 7, 2022
创建者 Nahid A
•Feb 13, 2021
T
创建者 Maxamed M
•Nov 3, 2020
w
创建者 Charlie B
•May 6, 2020
I
创建者 Dipesh T
•Sep 21, 2017
U
创建者 Patricia M
•Apr 4, 2022
During the course, there was the request that errors in the script should be made known if possible so that the script text could be corrected. I submitted various corrections but cannot see that they have been implemented and am wondering if and how such consructive submissions are actually heeded by the organisers of the course.
Some of the material that was to be downloaded was not possible and when I sent an enquiry on how to access the docments/information, I received no response. This is not conducive to motivating participants when they have the feeling that no one is attending their queries.
I would like to know how the system works on this type of course as the previous courses I have enrolled in were of a different nature than this one.
I found the challenges of composing essays on the individual themes each week quite a challenge and enjoyed researching the themes even though we were restricted in the number of words permitted. Sometimes I was disappointed that some participants did not fulfil the required number of words and again wondered how the organisers deal with such submissions?
How is it possible to receive a feedback from Simon Rolfe?
Looking at some of the +submissions over the weeks, I noticed that some were quite "old", i.e. a few years old and was wondering if the content of the videos was similar and just generalities were being put forward. The link to some further reading was also not of the recent past, does this mean that standard material is being used and not updated?
In general, I found that the videos in week 5 were a resume of the previous ones with considerable repetitions and another issue that puzzled me was the fact that after week 4 I was informed that I had "passed" the course when, in my opinion, the most challenging essay was the one to be submitted was at the end of week 5. How is this possible? Was the essay at the end of week 5 not of importance to the organisers of the course?
I would appreciate an acknowledgement of my comments and some answers as well. Thank you!