Chevron Left
返回到 Start the UX Design Process: Empathize, Define, and Ideate

学生对 Google 提供的 Start the UX Design Process: Empathize, Define, and Ideate 的评价和反馈

4.8
16,626 个评分

课程概述

Start the UX Design Process: Empathize, Define, Ideate is the second course in a certificate program that will equip you with the skills needed to apply to entry-level jobs in user experience (UX) design. In this course, you’ll complete the first phases of the design process for a project that you’ll be able to include in your portfolio. You will learn how to empathize with users and understand their pain points, define user needs using problem statements, and come up with lots of ideas for solutions to those user problems. Current UX designers and researchers at Google will serve as your instructors, and you will complete hands-on activities that simulate real-world UX design scenarios. Learners who complete the courses in this certificate program should be equipped to apply for entry-level jobs as UX designers. No previous experience is necessary. By the end of this course, you will be able to: - Empathize with users to understand their needs and pain points. - Create empathy maps, personas, user stories, and user journey maps to understand user needs. - Develop problem statements to define user needs. - Generate ideas for possible solutions to user problems. - Conduct competitive audits. - Start designing a mobile app, a new project to include in your professional UX portfolio....

热门审阅

MG

Sep 9, 2022

I love this course! Personally, it took me longer than I thought to complete each challenge, but I loved each step, especially the ideation and research part! I already want to start the next course!

AC

May 10, 2021

Beautifully designed course that is user friendly, and SUPER easy to use/navigate. The course has engaging and entertaining content that makes it easy to stay engaged and motivated. Nice job Google!!

筛选依据:

2801 - Start the UX Design Process: Empathize, Define, and Ideate 的 2825 个评论(共 2,938 个)

创建者 Sugam T

Aug 26, 2023

good

创建者 Sabarna K

Jul 18, 2023

Nice

创建者 Maithili B

Jun 11, 2023

good

创建者 vamsikrishna G

Apr 13, 2023

good

创建者 Shainee J

Dec 14, 2022

good

创建者 Udoka J

Nov 15, 2022

cool

创建者 Deleted A

Nov 13, 2022

good

创建者 Afilath N

Aug 22, 2022

Good

创建者 imene f

Jul 18, 2022

Good

创建者 Infant K B

Jun 27, 2022

GOOD

创建者 Allen

May 26, 2022

good

创建者 Samuel A D

Apr 28, 2022

Good

创建者 Sai N

Mar 30, 2022

Good

创建者 李好

Mar 13, 2022

good

创建者 Ruiz R

Jan 27, 2022

Good

创建者 santiago v r

Oct 2, 2021

Good

创建者 Sarah S

Jul 15, 2022

yes

创建者 Deekshitha B | A

Mar 28, 2025

no

创建者 NIVETHA S .

Feb 18, 2024

No

创建者 Stefano A

Dec 18, 2021

ok

创建者 Ganesh T

Jan 7, 2022

x

创建者 Hamza A

Aug 9, 2021

创建者 omar s

Jul 5, 2021

创建者 Connor W

Mar 30, 2022

While I think this course was built with good intentions and good ideas, there's a fundamental imbalance between the amount of time and energy students spend executing the exercises, which are primarily research based, and the results students have to show for those exercises. Week 5 felt like a lot of work especially, and ultimately also felt like wasted effort - there is a very insufficient amount of guidance in creating the audit chart, while simultaneously not nearly enough time is spent reviewing it. (For example, the exemplar project uses fictional companies and websites for its audit, but does not explain that beforehand, or at least did not do so in a way that was clear to me at the time. Not enough time is spent on comparing the features of real-world websites to learn what key features and pain points students should actually be looking out for when doing their audit. The concept is useful, but for it to be the end of the course feels really frustrating, and poorly executed on. Crazy eights was a fun, welcome break, but for our first actual hands-on exercise came way too late, and does not come alongside sufficient executable problem statements - I had to search for a problem statement generator of my own.

创建者 Brandon M

May 1, 2022

While this was the least exciting portion of the course, it was very necessary. This was like a sequel to the introduction. You will not begin working on prototypes or even wireframing. You will not begin working on actual designs. It's just mostly more definitions and a lot of Google reminding you over and over again that everyone has bias. While this is true, it feels a little condescending and off-putting. Why aren't we told that some bias is healthy? Does Google understand that we all live different experiences that shape us into the individuals we are? I suppose so, but why doesn't Google recognize, or mention, that our differences are often times what makes our teams more diverse and inclusive? I don't know the answer to these questions, but it's not really much of a big deal. You got yourself here, so go ahead and trust yourself, no matter what anyone anywhere tells you, and just keep pushing forward till you finish.