Should be better explained. Could not get past the first few lines in the practical. Looked at the discussion board and people were saying it was because the course is outdated and the code he explained might not even work with the version we were using

1- the language spoken is not clear (I had t oread the subtitles more than listening which was a horrible experience)

2- the labs are bot built in the right way, lots of errors and lots of data changes that effected the application of the commands

The guy teaching this course is barely understandable (it is clear English isn't his first language) and the entire course is riddled with spelling and grammatical errors

The explanations are not very clear. Concepts in Module 3 and 4 need to be explained with a lot more detail. A lot of the important ideas seem to have been skimmed over.

Horribly worded questions. Difficult to understand the lecturer. Week 1 was good to practice python. Week 2 was awful.

The code examples and quizzes have not been properly reviewed and there were multiple mistakes in them.

codes are not updated to python 3. Also little opportunity to apply codes in IDLE/Anacdona yourself.

Disorganized, and the quizzes are not testing abilities nor knowledge but just quantitative skills.

very vague and non detailed explanations from week 2. almost impossible to catch up.

week 1 was good

Very complex explanations (even if you learnt statistic before) and then zero practice. A fake!

Very poor delivery by the instructor. Course title inappropriate for the content.

the instructor is not understandable and don't really explain the material

A lot of formulas but it miss some example too generalist sometimes

I regret starting this course. You should unlist it from coursera.

very bad course. dont take it . no indepth knowledge.

Pathetic course content, no explanation of concepts

Poorly organized and presented. Waste of time.

not good