学生对 University of Washington 提供的 Programming Languages, Part B 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
AZ
Mar 23, 2018
Great course with really interesting and challenging assignments that allow to get more precise vision on programming languages (especially on PL's typing systems) and get experience with modern LISP
KR
Mar 22, 2018
I'm a pretty experienced C/C++ programmer and this course has been a brilliant introduction into functional programming and the underlying philosophies underpinning programming languages in general.
151 - Programming Languages, Part B 的 174 个评论(共 174 个)
创建者 Sorin J
•Aug 20, 2020
Outstanding!
创建者 Dingze W
•Jul 25, 2018
great course
创建者 Fry
•Sep 24, 2017
very good!!!
创建者 Sebastijan P
•Mar 8, 2019
TOP course.
创建者 Alejandro M
•Nov 21, 2016
Excellent!
创建者 Ahmed R
•Sep 5, 2023
Fabulous.
创建者 彭福伟
•Sep 27, 2016
wonderful
创建者 Juspreet S
•Feb 7, 2017
Awesome!
创建者 Marc D
•Aug 18, 2020
Great !
创建者 Devin
•Dec 7, 2017
Great!
创建者 shengrang
•Dec 19, 2016
nice
创建者 Dheimersão B E
•Oct 13, 2020
O
创建者 Ivan T
•Jun 24, 2017
G
创建者 Евгений Ш
•Sep 3, 2024
A good continuation of Programming Languages, Part A. The course contrasts the concepts of functional programming in a dynamic language. Pros: - very good comparison of static vs dynamic programming languages, - reinforcement of the same concepts in new way. Cons: - Racket (especially parentheses: Dan is right that HTML has the same approach, but in HTML/XML parentheses ARE DESCRIPTIVE). The instructor emphasizes that the concepts are what matters, not a particular implementation. However, this particular implementation is very painful, and you have to grasp it too to be able to do the assignments. Since almost nobody uses Racket in real development, it is a bad investment of time.
创建者 Dennis S
•Oct 30, 2024
I think the second module is too long. It should be split and homework should be split. Because after such a long module really forget a lot and hard to do homeworks; may be I say this because Racket has such un-intuitive language syntax so different from other languages.
创建者 Gregory G
•Jan 11, 2022
The MUPL exercise was hard. It involved writing a Racket interpreter for a made up programming language (MUPL).
创建者 alfred
•Jan 15, 2020
I think the course should be deeper and the assignment should be harder. Anyway, thanks for your effort!
创建者 Atsushi
•Jan 5, 2019
the course material was good! but the discussion forum was not so active.
创建者 Deleted A
•Oct 3, 2016
Excellent course material. Homework is a bit esoteric though.
创建者 刘长通
•Sep 26, 2016
I learned a lot from this course, thank you.
创建者 Wai K W
•Jan 15, 2021
great course
创建者 Venkatesh D
•Feb 5, 2017
Good
创建者 Mark B
•Jan 11, 2021
Showed a bit of Racket but could have done more. The ML part seemed to have more depth
创建者 Naresh
•Oct 15, 2020
i am not interested in this course i want unenroll this course