学生对 Stanford University 提供的 Probabilistic Graphical Models 1: Representation 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
RG
Jul 12, 2017
Prof. Koller did a great job communicating difficult material in an accessible manner. Thanks to her for starting Coursera and offering this advanced course so that we can all learn...Kudos!!
AB
Aug 30, 2018
Excellent course, the effort of the instructor is well reflected in the content and the exercices. A must for every serious student on (decision theory or markov random fields tasks.
301 - Probabilistic Graphical Models 1: Representation 的 314 个评论(共 314 个)
创建者 Volodymyr D
•Apr 11, 2020
Useful course on great subject, but poorly explained and supported. It was quite hard for me to get implicit ideas and Honors assignments. I ended up skipping Honors assignments since they're explained really really poorly and most of the time I spent trying to figure out what I'm required to do. Forums are inactive and no mentors reply to the posts. I don't recommend taking this course if you don't have someone to guide and help you.
创建者 Sami J
•Apr 22, 2020
Material is interesting but needs updating. Programming assignments have been marked as "Honors Assignments", which is a thinly veiled attempt to shirk responsibility for fixing bugs and providing student support. Quiz questions are vaguely worded. Overall the course is challenging, but only sometimes for the right reasons.
创建者 Shen C
•Jul 14, 2020
this course is a very difficult one. takes a lot of time and effort. forum is really useful (i wouldn't have passed without it). that said, it is also because there is little help from the lecturer and instructors. would appreciate more help.
创建者 Siavash R
•Aug 10, 2017
For me this was a difficult course not because of the material, but because of the teaching style. I don't think Dr. Koller is a very good teacher.
创建者 Xingjian Z
•Nov 2, 2017
Fun topic. But the explanation of the mentor is somewhat vague and the material is sometimes outdated and misleading.
创建者 Ujjval P
•Dec 13, 2016
Concepts covered in quiz and assignments are not covered well in the lecture videos, can be much better.
创建者 Jonathan K
•Jan 25, 2018
Interesting and useful material, but I found the lecturer unengaging.
创建者 Michel S
•Jul 14, 2018
Good course, but the material really needs a refresh!
创建者 Robert M
•Feb 6, 2018
Started off well. Finished poorly
创建者 Aswin T
•Sep 10, 2020
Very rigid questions, very theoretical. Very poor instructor support. Content needs to be improved. Very disconnected approach.
创建者 Deleted A
•Jun 11, 2020
very shallow explanation of important concepts
创建者 Shan-Jyun W
•Jun 24, 2017
Lectures are awful.
创建者 Belal M
•Sep 8, 2017
A very dry course.
创建者 Javier G
•Aug 4, 2020
Muy malo