good

Good

Good

Good

Good

Good

Nice

good

Good

good

cool

完美

.

.

n

.

J

I

G

I took this course for my own personal enrichment as an artist. I felt is was really thourogh on the artists it presented. I liked that there was a diverse pool of artists and art works presented, particularly if you look over the extra articles. Those were nicely mixed in with more well known artists to the average student. There are, however, far, far more artists and works in this time period that someone who completes a course in Modern Art History really should know. I'm not sure, however, that this course is intended to provide a more in depth study. Rather I believe it's supposed to be more of an overall introduction with some nice deep fives here and there, which certainly was accomplished. I am only giving it 4 instead of 5 stars because I was never able to post images, and therefore could not do assignments that required them. I was using my phone for the course, perhaps that's why. I plan to take another art history course and will use my laptop ( mostly so I can see images better) and see if that solves that problem. Overall, a really fantastic course and a good and resourceful way to spend time during the "stay at home" order...and...it's free!

Coursera is a great learning tool with flexibility. I was able to complete it in 3 days, so it's completely doable and not overwhelming. I would give it a 5, but 2 assessments are peer graded, and I received 100% on one and 66% on the other. This was because one of my peers critiqued I did not meet the rubric requirements. I do not mean to sound mean, but I did meet the requirements. This was seen as it did not dock off full points, but rather half points labeled "tie" because my other peer noticed I did have the requirements. I even had a friend who has zero knowledge of art history to see if I met all the requirements, and he said I had everything. But thankfully, the other assessment saved my grade, so I recommend doing both assessments just in case this happens to you.

This course deserves 5 stars except for the final examination submission. There were two descriptions of what the 2 essays should contain, one in the page before the submission and one in the submission page. They were different. Then when one submits the photo of the work of art in the 2nd essay, the title and "caption" are described as optional. I saw that many people did not submit a "caption" (which is where you are supposed to put the essay)... however when you are asked to rate their submissions... there is nothing for you to rate since there is only a photograph of a work of art. You don't know what category it belongs to nor what they think about it. It is really too bad that they will not be graded properly... especially if they paid for the course.