学生对 University of Washington 提供的 Machine Learning: Classification 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
JC
Mar 28, 2016
This continues UWash's outstanding Machine Learning series of classes, and is equally as impressive, if not moreso, then the Regression class it follows. I'm super-excited for the next class!
RB
Oct 19, 2020
This class was very interesting. I learned a lot. I really enjoyed the way the instructor presented the information. The programming assignments were challenging learning opportunities.
551 - Machine Learning: Classification 的 575 个评论(共 589 个)
创建者 Rahul S
•Jun 16, 2020
Too much confusion, I face too much problem with this course. much confusion if you use different packages like sklearn.
创建者 Fengchen G
•May 18, 2016
The course content seemed to be rushed out, as a result, the quality is not as good as the first two.
创建者 Tu L
•Jun 27, 2018
Why don't you guys talk about ID3 or CART algorithm at all? This one is too basic.
创建者 Mounir
•Jun 19, 2016
Exercises for Scikit-learn users were not organised.
Course took too long to start
创建者 Pier L L
•Mar 26, 2017
Nice course but I would have expected more techniques (SVM for instance)
创建者 Dmitri B
•Jun 6, 2017
Theory Quizes are good, but programming assignment not so good for me.
创建者 Ashish C
•Mar 31, 2019
more topics like deep learning, neural networks need to be introduced
创建者 Matt T
•Apr 12, 2016
Good, but overemphasizes niche software product (graphlab).
创建者 Virgil P
•Feb 18, 2018
The exercises/assignments are far too simple
创建者 陈弘毅
•Feb 3, 2018
too simple
创建者 Deleted A
•Aug 13, 2020
good
创建者 Omkar v D
•Aug 14, 2018
.
创建者 Rohan L
•Aug 29, 2020
I leave 2 stars as I learned a lot of new information and methods, and the theory and math behind them.
You will learn about Data Science and Machine Learning, but not much about Python.
The course is pretty much abandoned and outdated. Sframes and Turicreate packages (instructor's creations) are used instead of more universal packages. Installation in the beginning took some time and research. Many of the assignments have errors and bugs in the code that have not been updated. Forum assistance is abysmal for clarification or deeper questions. Many links are dead.
There are many times in the lectures where the instructors are writing several sentences in their handwriting on their notes instead of having the text ready to appear.
I would suggest using this course and series as a supplement to other information one as learned, not as an introduction for initial understanding. I found myself frustrated too many times.
创建者 Amit K
•Jan 19, 2018
The video content is awesome. Important concepts are being clarified in a very simple manner. However the evaluation method really sucks. First, there is too much spoon feeding in the programming assignments, which was not the case in earlier courses in the same specialisation. Secondly, in a few assignments, the answer to the quiz questions are sensitive to the platform we are using (like PC vs AWS instance). This was really frustrating given that the issue is known for a long time and has not been fixed yet. At the very least, there should be a warning on the quiz page itself.
创建者 Yaron K
•Sep 30, 2016
The assignments are well thought out and explain the algorithms step-by-step. The subtitles/transcripts are a disappointment :( . Full of mistakes. Sometimes to the point of being useless or even worse - saying the exact of opposite of what the lecturer says. Since the lecturer sometimes is unclear - this is problematic. As usual - Graphlab Create sometimes crashes, however there are explanations how to run the assignments using Scikit-Learn.
创建者 Matthew B
•Apr 3, 2016
The content seems rather thinner than that of earlier courses in the specialization, and seems to get more so as the course progresses. (Week 6 is entirely spent on Precision and Recall, with only about 30 min of lecture.) It feels like there was a rush to get the course out and that corners may have been cut at the end.
And as others have mentioned, several very important classification topics are conspicuously missing.
创建者 Alois H
•Sep 23, 2017
Overall good explanations in the videos; however, too much reliance on GraphLab, so that it seems more like promotional course for the instructor's own software and company. Also, the course is generally a bit light on content - the only algorithms discussed are Logistic Regression, Decision Trees and AdaBoost. Spending a full week on precision & recall is way too much time.
This course needs to be re-created using new professors.
Way too lazy IMO.
Too many "trick questions", total confusion between Python 2.x and 3.x
Too theoretical, almost no practical examples
Quizes are very poor and give no "hints" or true workhtrough examples pror to test.
This is a problem with all Coursera, though.
创建者 Vasilios D
•Oct 5, 2016
I am afraid that this course is, to a large extend, a marketing tool for promoting the instructors' proprietary product. Its use is therefore limited for the practitioners that want a foundation on the free Python data/ML capabilities.
I would not recommend this course to my colleagues.
创建者 Keith L
•Nov 25, 2016
Not as polished/comprehensive as the previous courses (especially week1, week5 and week6). But useful techniques nevertheless.
创建者 Stefan W
•Oct 28, 2018
The speaker is very difficult to understand, and the environment for writing code is awful (web browser).
创建者 Vladyslav P
•Apr 17, 2016
Extremely highlevel, quality of the material is significantly lower than in the previous courses.
创建者 Enrico R
•May 15, 2016
Course is too slow to keep focus, it's repetitive but not clear when it's really needed.
创建者 Liliana V P G
•Apr 13, 2016
The classes are not practical, and the voice of the teacher is very monotone, boring.