Loads of typos/spelling mistakes throughout, some contradictory statements in the quizzes that need to all be ticked, some questions are unclear... Overall the content isn't bad but the entire course needs to be spellchecked and reviewed.

Good survey material for those unfamiliar with statistical concepts, but the training material is incomplete, misleading, RIDDLED with spelling/technical mistakes, and only the forums address the methods to submit homework correctly.

Not too many explanations for the assignment, only 2 rows which are supposed to tell us exactly what we have to do. This is why everyone ended up creating very different things, which made it harder when reviewing their work.

Great course but the final assignment was very fiddly with standard libraries not being uploaded properly in the Watson lab notebook provided. There was no option to use local environments to mitigate this. Hence 3 starts

I think that the Machine Learning Models taught were explained really well In theory to help understand what we are doing. However, there is not much explanation to the syntax of the models which could be elaborated on.

It's good course if you have not heard anything about Machine Learning, however I would like that teach important techniques such as neural networks, PCA because they are used many times in different jobs and studies.

The course was very intense and it was not clear what was wanted from you(i.e. the scope you're expected to know for the exams)

The quizzes are vastly different from the final project and don't prepare you for it.

The assignments covered only the basics, without aspects like overfitting detection, hyperparameter tuning, ensemble learning, clustering, dimensionality reduction, missing data imputation, and cross validation.

I got a great understanding of the concepts but, there should have been more videos related to the implementation(coding) part. There was just once use of Third-party tool for every module and nowhere else...

Content was good, a bit shallow on some aspects (didn't cover many ML techniques, was light on SVM content, etc.). But the quizzes were too easy and didn't properly test technical aspects of the course.

The sections on Clustering and Recommender Systems were difficult to follow. It would have been ideal if they had more in-depth video explanations or if the contents in the lab notebooks was simplified.

It is a really good course for understanding theories and covers vast topics! The concept were explained very nicely but it lacked proper mathematical working of algorithms or deep intuition about them.

There is more theory than practical examples and exercises. The final project is nowhere near the actual course syllabus. No ML algorithm is taught in the course. But you ask them in the final project.

The instructor is very good and explanation of concepts is very clear.

But the code explaination is not there so we have to search for each keyword on google. Just wanted to have someone to explain code.

not deep enough, many algorithm and model evaluation approaches that wasn't include in this course. But I think for beginner who just get into a Data Science or ML things, this is a good modules

Its Ok. From Theoretical aspect, its good as a introduction. But for Python, this is not like introductory. Python programming is just reading materials. There are no videos for explanation.

Content of course was great but, it could have been expressed in more understandable manner. Better visualization of techniques and lessons would make it more easier to grasp and implement.

Course is very slow paced and too much focus on technical terms and rote learning tests , not practical test / coding tests or mathematical tests . Could've been better and more interesting

So much stuff skimmed, left unexplained. Explanations are very shallow. This course gives you an idea on what you will have to do to tackle ML learning, but I can't say it fully teaches it.

Good explanations in the video, however the complementary notebooks are lacking in depth explanations. The capstone project is underwhelming, as it only includes classifications algorithms.

Was very hard with the algebra. Most of the time they explained the formulas and I was lost. After that they said "This is not mandatory because it is already in the NumPy / SciPy library"

A really good course, until you get to the final project, which is terribly written. It is unclear what the actual objectives of the final task are supposed to be, and the English is poor.

Really interesting subject, but the course material was just insufficient for beginners. The new codes were not explained. Out of all the other courses, I learned the least in this one.

the course content is good, the course exercises are great. But there is no responsible human TA monitoring the discussion forum. So if you get stuck in a problem, then good luck to you.

I understand that you want to cover many methods in this course, but you see so much that it is confusing, difficult to assimilate. I think this is the least good of the entire series.