学生对 IBM 提供的 Introduction to Cybersecurity Essentials 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
GA
Dec 20, 2022
Kudos to the Team for such an Amazing class.i am eternally grateful and proud of myself for this noble privilege.. Thank you for the opportunity to learn and God bless you all. -George
RT
Nov 3, 2022
I am very happy with the contents and also learned a lot in the field of cyber security. I will recommend this course to everyone who wants to start with cyber security.
201 - Introduction to Cybersecurity Essentials 的 225 个评论(共 229 个)
创建者 Yuliia S
•Nov 1, 2024
Nice basic course! Labs in virtual environment sometimes can lag. F.e. it's impossible to type there smth
创建者 Adrià B
•Jun 14, 2025
Bastante bine, pero el simulador de Windows para la parte práctica no va demasiado bien.
创建者 Jelena B
•Aug 14, 2025
Really good! Lost a star due to the bad AI used for the final assessment.
创建者 Gilbert G
•Aug 23, 2023
excellent introduction to what you need to know about cybersecurity.
创建者 Jennifer P
•May 18, 2022
It was worth taking. Much better than what my own employer provided.
创建者 Luis C
•May 29, 2025
Great course. Lab sessions were nonresponsive at times
创建者 himabindu h
•Dec 9, 2024
The whole learning part was amazing in this course
创建者 Beverly A
•Jan 19, 2023
NIce to get a general knowledge in this topic!
创建者 Cristian S
•Oct 12, 2024
Muy buen curso, aprendí mucho, gracias
创建者 Deepak K D
•Nov 4, 2025
Excellent learning course
创建者 Saud A W
•Jul 8, 2025
good but lengthy
创建者 Sendo T
•May 2, 2024
Good contents.
创建者 Muhammed A
•Oct 12, 2024
nice course.
创建者 Mohamed
•Aug 11, 2025
Very Good
创建者 AMPALLI P
•May 31, 2023
good
创建者 البندري ف ع آ خ ا ف ع آ خ
•Feb 8, 2023
شكرا
创建者 maqsudova i
•Dec 21, 2024
zor
创建者 Rajesh K B
•Nov 20, 2024
OK
创建者 Kevin B
•Jul 10, 2024
Possibly make more hands on lab work by splitting up some of the ones here into smaller pieces, that way the student will need to have remembered, or go back again and re-read, their notes or the modules for the answers. This way instead of doing several small things, the repetition of tasks spread out, while a little more time consuming, could help reinforce the lessons learned.
创建者 Stanislas R
•Jul 31, 2025
Le cours est bien, les vidéos sont assez claires, et les labs c'est une excellente chose. Par contre, tout le cours est en anglais, mais les tests sont traduits par IA en français, ce qui amène à des incompréhensions complètes ou à des questions qui n'ont aucun sens. (Q: Qu'est ce que la propriété intellectuelle ? - Réponse possible : Propriété intellectuelle...
创建者 Henrry B R
•Jan 11, 2025
Tiene lab esto lo hace muy interesante
创建者 Anjali R
•Mar 7, 2025
Good experience
创建者 Stephen v M
•Jan 8, 2025
Overly redundant, as tho they have compiled a curriculum from various sources and didn't bother to edit it. Extremely basic information, with no technical education on offer
创建者 Eslam H
•Oct 24, 2022
how ever the information is enriching , the course is sro robotic
创建者 Ian L P
•Feb 26, 2025
At the time when I am enrolled, there are too many obvious indicators of AI generated material. There are excessive inaccuracies, repetitions, and errors in spelling and grammar. One example of many, in the module 4 glossary, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol Script protocol (HTTP protocol)" and "Hypertext Transfer Protocol Script Secure protocol (HTTPS protocol)" are defined which have obvious mistakes in the expansion of the acronyms. HTTP is an acronym for "Hypertext Transfer Protocol", and and HTTPS represents"Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure". Even "HTTP protocol" and "HTTPS protocol" use the "protocol" word redundantly, and calling them "Hypertext Transfer Protocol Script protocol" and "Hypertext Transfer Protocol Script Secure protocol" is even less accurate. The author / AI system seems to fail differentiating "JavaScript" from "Java", and JavaScript is often mislabeled as Java which can mislead students about the target functionality of both programming languages. Even the quizzes seem AI influenced, where some multiple choice questions offer several answers that can be considered "correct", and it is up to the student to guess which page or aspect the (probably AI) system was evaluating at the time the question was auto-generated. The answer expected on several questions is debatable, and there are many cases where I could easily demonstrate why a "wrong" answer is more correct than the answer expected as "correct" by the evaluation. Whether the material is AI generated or not, it seriously needs some evaluation and editing. To the creator(s) of these lessons, if you're going to make AI generated lessons, at least review them first. If the lessons are not AI generated, they need extensive proofreading and correction from people actually familiar with the subject.