The information was good but could have used more information in the quizes, especially when there was a mistake. I also thought the order was a bit messed up as we were cfeating the sprint plan and not really having a good idea what the story points meant until the end of the course.

My rating is based on the amount of errors in the content of the course - misspellings and completely different information from the video, to the text and what the professor was actually saying - like considering Adaptation the same as Adopting

The coutrse is very hard to listen since the narrator doesn't have a structured material and prepared speach. Too many unnessesary noices and low-prepared material. Do not recommend this course for thise aiming to get a SCRUM master knowledge.

Minor typos and grammar issues in transcripts and quizzes. Also, some of the quiz questions are confusing and in some rare instances not directly tied to what has been discussed.

Subject matter was on point, but the presentation deck had quite a few typos and punctuation/capitalization errors.

need updated slides and a better narrator. also there were a lot fo spelling errors on the slides and readings

Good structure, but many spelling mistakes, and a lot of text to read in the slides parallel with the videos

Some questions were misleading or flat out wrong. Course material could use some more interactive elements.

There are many typos, the instruction is dry, and there are some missing resources. (links that don't work)

it was eh, and I don't feel it gave me any professional edge. Much was redundant of the Google PMP cert.

this course needs review... some of the readings have glaring spelling and context errors.

To many misspellings and wrong words. They distract from the lessons

Could be more to the point. As it does involve many repeatitions.

Outdated information not according to current scrum guide

No pude hacer los ultimos examen por un fallo de sistema

Proof reading would have helped this greatly

Content and course delivery was good.

show be more detailed

Mainly definitions

amazing course.

.

While I found most of the content to be beneficial, I have a few areas for improvement to recommend: 1. The instructor simply reads the slides to the learner 90% of the time. 2. The course relies heavily on external articles; however, many instances require a membership. (at a cost) to access the full article(s) so the learner misses out on the potential insight the articles may have provided. 3. Many of the narrative portions of the courses contained typos (grammar, spelling, spacing). 4. The fourth course include some very technical content; too technical for a beginner's course.

There were a number of minor typos in this course, which was discouraging. The main issue is the Week 1 content would have been better with an example project to run through, as there were so many definitions without seeing them in action. The lectures were ususally too short, but the second week had better lectures.

I'm disappointed that the certificate you earn doesn't even display your name. The "verify" link just takes you to the same certification. There's nothing to prove this isn't someone else's certification. UGH

Vocabulary and rules not always compliant with scrum.org. Confusing for PSM exam.