Name: Speaking to inform: Discussing complex ideas with clear explanations and dynamic slides
Brand: University of Washington
Availability: OnlineOnly
Rating: 4.8 (128 reviews)

返回到 Speaking to inform: Discussing complex ideas with clear explanations and dynamic slides

学生对 University of Washington 提供的 Speaking to inform: Discussing complex ideas with clear explanations and dynamic slides 的评价和反馈

4.8

星

445 个评分

课程概述

In the professional realm, most speeches and presentations we give are informative in scope. A scientist needs to explain her recent research findings. A financial officer needs to report on quarterly earnings to his company’s board. A technology professional needs to educate a consumer about a new product. Any time you need to convey ideas or demonstrate a process, you’re dealing with informative speaking. Informative speaking is a fun puzzle. You need to think from the perspective of your audience to identify what they need to hear in order to understand the key ideas. How much does the audience already know? What are the most important elements to convey? How should one convey these ideas with appropriate breadth and depth given the time constraints of the speech? This demands a strategic approach to speech design that we’ll undertake in this class. By the end of the course, you should be able to explain complex ideas vividly and accessibly, design clear and compelling presentation slides, convey your passion for a topic while maintaining your professional credibility, and speak dynamically from notes and/or a manuscript. Learners will record speeches, providing and receiving peer feedback....

101 - Speaking to inform: Discussing complex ideas with clear explanations and dynamic slides 的 125 个评论（共 128 个）

创建者 Pushpalatha R R

•

Oct 10, 2024

good

创建者 Sultan S

•

Oct 8, 2023

True

创建者 HieuNTCA161046

•

Mar 3, 2022

good

创建者 Verónica R M H

•

Sep 21, 2020

Good

创建者 Mona A A

•

Jun 16, 2020

创建者 Eslam A K A

•

Feb 13, 2021

创建者 Rolandas R

•

May 30, 2017

创建者 Santosh S

•

Jul 30, 2017

Good course, particularly for informative speeches.

I am doctoral student nearing by thesis proposal, so I was wondering - how the course will help me to structure my presentation.

Though the course is helpful, but I would have loved little more treatment of such topics like presenting proposals, defense, data. This treatment is bit sketchy in the course.

However, I will highly recommend the course to any doctoral student or anyone who wish to get into academia.

创建者 Mikhael P A H

•

Jun 5, 2024

This course has been exciting to follow, I greatly enjoyed Mr. Matt's delivery of the lessons. It was just rather difficult to overcome, as this course was layered over the ordinary lectures of my university subject here. Otherwise, I greatly enjoyed it

创建者 Katia P R

•

Sep 9, 2020

Hola termine mi curso de forma exitosa,pero en la ultima semana aparece un comentario de que abandone,lo cual no es verdad si revisan mis trabajos y tareas están completas.

Gracias.

创建者 Sarah R

•

Apr 22, 2020

Enjoyed doing the course. I think I have learned skills that will be very useful in future. It was good to engage in all the assignments as it really does help build confidence

创建者 ROMY S

•

Jan 29, 2021

Excellent course to brush up those skills and there are some inherent nuances shared by Dr. Matt which are highly practical and important.

创建者 Ahila N

•

Oct 26, 2023

It very useful and help us to explain our view. in various way to better understand audience

创建者 César A

•

Oct 22, 2020

An amazing course the teacher knows how to give an exciting class.. great!

创建者 Sethu R

•

Feb 5, 2025

very useful to acknowledge

创建者 Nguyen T T N

•

Jul 10, 2019

I prefer fewer peer-review

创建者 Akella K M

•

Nov 4, 2021

Great course content!

创建者 yassiny d

•

Jul 3, 2022

Great course !!!

创建者 Palani T A

•

Jan 22, 2020

Very useful.

创建者 Supraja G

•

Oct 15, 2024

good

创建者 Huda M S A O

•

Mar 20, 2018

创建者 GIOSUE P

•

Jun 11, 2019

The course should provide less explanatory sessions and more practice-based tips.

The videos are often repetitive and do not provide enough ground on theories of perception - i.e. how are we perceived while we do something when we speak?

Mostly generic.