学生对 West Virginia University 提供的 Forensic Accounting and Fraud Examination 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
JJ
Jun 26, 2022
The professors were well prepared, clear and interesting. As someone completely new to the field and with no business background, I had difficulty with some concepts and terminology. I passed!!!!!!!
AG
Aug 14, 2016
An extrely good course to introduce people to Fraud Examination and Forensic Accounting. I think a future course may have to be somewhat longer and have a bit more detail on Forensic Accounting.
1776 - Forensic Accounting and Fraud Examination 的 1800 个评论(共 1,810 个)
创建者 Jaime P P
•Aug 13, 2017
You need to supply appropriate study material & web-site links. You need to be savvy searching for supporting material to understand certain topics & definitions.
创建者 Nilmadhab H
•May 26, 2020
Although the topics discussed are interesting, the topics taught many a times do not have a correlation with the questions framed in the quizzes.
创建者 Balakrishnan S
•Jan 15, 2021
The course describes about the overall view of the subject. You have to go far long to gain practical knowledge... Its a more general course
创建者 Patrick m
•Mar 8, 2021
Interesting, but I was hoping for something more detailed, technical, and in depth. This was really an intro class
创建者 Sameer S
•Sep 15, 2020
The course is Awesome but the quiz is nerve recking took me almost 2 days to complete to keep redoing the quiz
创建者 Ahmad H H
•Jan 14, 2018
Pretty good but not reach enough. it does not offer any practical quantitative methods to catch frauds.
创建者 pranav s
•Sep 15, 2020
1. Should make the course a little more detailed.
2. Should provide more material for the course.
创建者 CA R J
•Aug 16, 2020
Good for those who want's to have a basic knowledge of forensic accounting and fraud examination.
创建者 Vivek S
•Aug 21, 2020
The course was neither thoroughly explained nor practically taught. Very disappointed!!
创建者 Ajay Y
•Jul 13, 2021
This is good as a beginner's course only, does not go into details on advanced topics
创建者 Ram D
•Dec 25, 2022
It was good for Basic knowledge.
Though I couldn't find anything 'Forensic" in it
创建者 Damon D
•Dec 6, 2020
Has some solid information but is really lacking without the accompanying text.
创建者 Jakousi U C
•Sep 25, 2017
Se siente como un infocomercial. It feels like a commercial.
创建者 Shinbey V
•Jun 26, 2024
this is good as a 101 for Fraud Management.
创建者 Gnananandan
•Aug 23, 2020
Can be more diagrammatically represented
创建者 faris a
•Apr 17, 2021
It was fantastic and helpful course
创建者 JONATHAN C
•Mar 24, 2023
interesting fund but very outdated
创建者 Stefan A
•May 20, 2020
Good introduction into the Topic.
创建者 Nurfarhana I b M R
•Jan 12, 2025
best and fun to learn
创建者 Nyoike D
•Dec 11, 2020
very well structured
创建者 Magno M S d S
•Jan 4, 2017
Kinda superficial...
创建者 Mark A U
•Feb 18, 2016
t
very
创建者 Riya S
•Mar 27, 2025
good
创建者 Kristy D
•Jan 23, 2019
Lectures are excellent -- clear presentation from three professors with great sound -- easy to understand. Video of interviews from people who are convicted of fraud are fascinating. However, in an attempt to make the testing portion appropriately challenging and less open to cheating the multiple choice questions can be really obscure or oversimplified to the point of being wrong.
I'm disappointed in the online discussions -- NOT the fault of the course -- they seem to be improving their accounting knowledge while working full time and English is a second language so there isn't much posting, there's very little dialogue between students. I do appreciate Vincenzo Ferri's role as monitor -- it helps connect us.
创建者 Taylor C M
•Mar 20, 2023
Content I think was rudimentary and lacked the depth required for Forensic Accounting. Moreover, Test Questions were hard to understand as they were not articulated well. In some cases the selection may have been the write answer, but not the best answer. Discussion work was not always based on the topics covered, which was sometimes disappointing. Lastly, it appears that some students did not participate in the discussion work. While I realize it was optional, it appears some students did not apply effort.