ćŠçćŻč Columbia University æäŸç Construction Scheduling çèŻä»·ććéŠ
èŻŸçšæŠèż°
çéšćźĄé
SK
Oct 1, 2023
Great lecture videos and course content as well as quizzes but a little bit focus is required on primavera lecture video resolution to clearly see every command and option.
BA
Mar 15, 2019
It was a very dynamic course which contained many useful knowledge. I gained many important information that will help me a lot.Thanks to Coursera and to my Instructors.
401 - Construction Scheduling ç 425 äžȘèŻèźșïŒć ± 431 äžȘïŒ
ćć»șè abdirahman a
âąNov 22, 2021
very good course
ćć»șè Sowmya K
âąOct 10, 2017
Very good course
ćć»șè Abdul G
âąAug 16, 2023
well explained
ćć»șè Matthew Y
âąOct 17, 2025
Decent course
ćć»șè Humberto M E C
âąJun 29, 2018
Great course!
ćć»șè Naji u
âąFeb 24, 2025
great course
ćć»șè Hikmatullah M
âąApr 22, 2019
Good course
ćć»șè Jeff R
âąMay 3, 2017
good course
ćć»șè Pinninti S
âąFeb 5, 2026
Thank
ćć»șè Khaled A
âąFeb 15, 2025
GOOD
ćć»șè Bokay V S
âąAug 30, 2022
good
ćć»șè YERUVA D R
âąFeb 28, 2022
good
ćć»șè Thein H O
âąAug 8, 2021
Good
ćć»șè Vicente B
âąNov 11, 2020
The first few weeks were straight-forward. The Activity on Arrow and Line of Balance lectures, quizzes and assignments were confusing and frustrating. The final quiz, besides having a typo on Monte Carlo, also had a question graded as wrong, with the comment saying "Correct!" Week 5 should have been broken in half because remembering minutia from nearly 4 hours of lectures is not realistic.
ćć»șè Nader N A
âąAug 6, 2023
This course has a lot of information which we may not use all of them, some lectures can be minimized and/or removed to shorten the duration of the course and focus on the most used/common methods of scheduling.
ćć»șè Olawale O
âąApr 6, 2021
Information packed course, and very interesting. But The course seems very theoretical. The topics are delivered a bit in a rush, maybe because of time. So much concepts and ideas squeezed into short videos
ćć»șè Michael T
âąFeb 14, 2021
Overall the course was helpful, but I found certain sections very confusing, especially the Line of Balance and Activity on Arrow diagramming.
ćć»șè Harrison S
âąJul 25, 2024
Great introductory material, with a few great presenters. I wish the content were a bit more up-to-date and the forum engagement higher.
ćć»șè Joe P
âąMar 10, 2022
Theres easier ways to explain those calculations. But i did learn some stuff so I guess thats cool
ćć»șè Joshua B
âąMar 3, 2021
More of a PM course than a CM. Obviously a CM needs to know what a PM is trying to do but...
ćć»șè Houssein A A
âąDec 11, 2022
Real-life examples should be shown the lean schedule needs examples
ćć»șè juan m h
âąDec 5, 2019
The proficency of the teachers on english language should be higher
ćć»șè Touaf R
âąApr 29, 2023
lecture should be more clear in audio ,voice is rough to heard.
ćć»șè Nicholas L
âąSep 30, 2024
Very confusing at points, not sure 60% fail rate is great number. SAYING, I did learn quite about when it comes to building a schedule and estimating job activity times. I just feel that this course needs a bit of smoothing, Myself and it seemed many others definitely relied on the discussions which I guess is what its for but I don't know just seemed like it was missing some smoothing and details.
ćć»șè I O (
âąAug 12, 2017
Highly Academic other modules were more practical like forward and backward pass