å¦ēåƹ University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign ęä¾ē Banking and Financial Institutions ēčÆä»·ååé¦
čƾēØę¦čæ°
ēéØå®”é
MM
Feb 8, 2023
Prof. Rus is great, enthusiastic and engaging. I learned a lot in this class and left wanting more.
AS
Feb 1, 2025
good for the beginners who is opting for banking career
51 - Banking and Financial Institutions ē 75 äøŖčÆč®ŗļ¼å ± 79 äøŖļ¼
åå»ŗč Muhammadmustafo E
ā¢Apr 6, 2022
perfect
åå»ŗč Kalyani T
ā¢Jan 20, 2026
Good
åå»ŗč Varun N G
ā¢Nov 4, 2025
Good
åå»ŗč Mahesh D M
ā¢Oct 15, 2025
Good
åå»ŗč NUR A B M H
ā¢Mar 27, 2025
Good
åå»ŗč Jyothi Y
ā¢Dec 12, 2024
good
åå»ŗč Neeraj G
ā¢Dec 3, 2024
Good
åå»ŗč Taj P
ā¢Oct 18, 2023
nice
åå»ŗč sweatha V
ā¢Aug 19, 2023
nice
åå»ŗč Ehsan V
ā¢Feb 8, 2023
š
åå»ŗč saiful a
ā¢Feb 8, 2025
the peer-graded assignment has a very high passing grade. 8/10 grade seems normal, but the scoring metrics determined that the good answer is scored 7/10 (only exceptional answer is 10). the problem is peer graders are subjective, and idk why but my submission is rated (on avg) 7/10 or less despite actually matching the scoring criteria, and the graders provide no commentary feedback. so, it's just annoying to resubmit the answer all the time without knowing what's wrong (if there's even anything wrong at all).
åå»ŗč Mustafa E D
ā¢Jan 6, 2023
Peer graded assignment has a rubric grading incorrect answer.
Otherwise a good overall course.
åå»ŗč Varshu S
ā¢Jul 23, 2022
Very informative useful and interesting course overall
åå»ŗč Tyron M
ā¢Jun 25, 2023
It was a good course
åå»ŗč Binyameen
ā¢Jan 22, 2025
very good
åå»ŗč Rittu S V
ā¢Aug 5, 2024
Very good
åå»ŗč Karthika S
ā¢Oct 21, 2022
good
åå»ŗč James M
ā¢Feb 9, 2025
good
åå»ŗč Sruti S
ā¢Jan 7, 2025
good
åå»ŗč Nitin O
ā¢Nov 26, 2024
nice
åå»ŗč ARUN K B A
ā¢Jul 21, 2024
good
åå»ŗč Swarnika K
ā¢Jun 2, 2024
This course is designed in a very monotonous way. The content itself is fine but the way in which the concepts have been imparted is not at all good. The instructor speaks in a very serious and monotonous way which makes it very hard to follow him or pay attention. This makes learning difficult. Apart from this, there are errors too in some of the quizzes. Some questions have been repeated in some quizzes and the answer is different in every one of them for the exact same question. Because of this, you wouldn't even know which is the exact correct answer and they don't even give a proper feedback after you have finished to quiz. It just states which questions you got right and which ones you got wrong. It does not tell you the reason. Because of all these reasons, I've rated this course 3.
åå»ŗč Isgar B
ā¢Mar 14, 2024
This course is sold as intermediate, but really is a beginners level. Touches many topics but fails to get into the depth. Looking for more specialized courses for advanced levels. Second, information is unbalanced concerning the banking sector. FED purchased certainly not only good credit after 2008. Purchased RMBS at face value for example. That makes a course more lively when failures are included. Third missing how the transfer of funds from MM to CM flows, using balance sheets. Recommend Economics of Banking from Barnard P. Mehrling. In all a superficial course that does satisfy the curious learner. Please contact me with a more in-depth course for my pleasure, thanks.
åå»ŗč Justin.M
ā¢Dec 4, 2024
not opening certificte
åå»ŗč Nithin.T
ā¢Jun 30, 2022
it is good course