学生对 University of Minnesota 提供的 Software Development Processes and Methodologies 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
CP
Sep 20, 2020
Be wary of first peer reviewed assignment--requires detailed readings and not all reviewers take the time to read what you wrote or even the rubric.
SS
Apr 10, 2022
I found this course very impressive. Such amazing context is not available even on you tube. The way of presentation is outstanding and the real world examples make it perfect for anyone.
401 - Software Development Processes and Methodologies 的 425 个评论(共 440 个)
创建者 Luis F P M
•May 21, 2021
Excellente course
创建者 Aniket D
•Sep 12, 2020
thank you so much
创建者 DALAWAI S M
•Nov 1, 2020
very nice course
创建者 ishaan o
•Mar 27, 2018
excellent cource
创建者 Choda M v k
•Oct 8, 2021
helpful course
创建者 MAYANK R
•May 2, 2020
Nice Content
创建者 施寬陞
•Nov 12, 2021
No problem
创建者 Maredla G
•Oct 19, 2021
Helppful
创建者 DATLA N V
•Aug 30, 2021
Helpfull
创建者 Fizzah S
•Aug 26, 2021
worth it
创建者 Sudhir S
•May 14, 2024
masssst
创建者 Amit R Y
•Oct 28, 2021
good
创建者 SRAVYA C V
•Oct 22, 2021
good
创建者 SIBHI H V S 1
•Jul 29, 2020
N
i
c
e
创建者 Tejaswini V
•Sep 30, 2019
Good
创建者 Steve M
•Feb 22, 2026
Putting 3 stars for now. Starts out great, but goes down hill when discussing software design/architecture. Too much hand waving by module 2.Overloading certain terms is fine when there is a marker to help make a distinction.But descending in to babbling pretending it 'this is all part of the art form' is ridiculous.Even real art has discipline, painting has different schools of thought and even mixing pigments and holding a brush has well defined standards. Shaping a mold has standards. To pretend that software design is some kind of 'black art' in a 'black box' is preposterous. In module 2 there are lectures and questions that basically say 'the best solution is often NOT the most popular one'. The fact that the world is so dependent on aws, microsoft, oracle pretty much proves that to be a lie. The fact that there are proven software design patterns that are used as almost a default for efficiency proves that the best solution IS IN FACT the one that is widely popular in the industry. This course is ridiculous. I wonder if I should waste my time getting to Module 3.
创建者 Taylor H
•Mar 22, 2025
I found that courses 2 and 3 were better explained than courses 1 and 4. In courses 1 and 4, the topics were difficult to grasp for someone without a coding background, and the explanations were vague. Additionally, many of the resource links did not work, and I found that almost every peer assignment I was asked to review had clearly been written by AI.
创建者 addanki v v s p
•Dec 18, 2020
course is good actually, but the main problem is plagiarism issues, which is so terrific. i submit my works doing for my self , but i still get the issues of error. i don't know why this system was failed in detecting the real work vs copied work
创建者 Sean S
•May 30, 2023
Good material, but assignments were too easy, and most peers I had to peer review were either bots or entering nonsense submissions.
创建者 Nhat T (
•Mar 11, 2019
A good enough course. Material are sometimes difficult to follow. Assignment are quite different from what were being taught.
创建者 Avanti M D
•Jan 26, 2021
Course is good. But it lags in detailed description. Slide presentation is not explained in detail.
创建者 Alpish J
•Apr 4, 2020
It could have been better.But it was better than what my college taught.
创建者 Neil S
•Nov 17, 2017
Very repetitive and not detailed enough.
创建者 Katuri B
•Oct 26, 2021
good
创建者 Sandhya P
•Jun 25, 2020
Nice