Chevron Left
返回到 Software Development Processes and Methodologies

学生对 University of Minnesota 提供的 Software Development Processes and Methodologies 的评价和反馈

4.7
2,124 个评分

课程概述

Software is quickly becoming integral part of human life as we see more and more automation and technical advancements. Just like we expect car to work all the time and can't afford to break or reboot unexpectedly, software industry needs to continue to learn better way to build software if it were to become integral part of human life. In this course, you will get an overview of how software teams work? What processes they use? What are some of the industry standard methodologies? What are pros and cons of each? You will learn enough to have meaningful conversation around software development processes. After completing this course, a learner will be able to 1) Apply core software engineering practices at conceptual level for a given problem. 2) Compare and contrast traditional, agile, and lean development methodologies at high level. These include Waterfall, Rational Unified Process, V model, Incremental, Spiral models and overview of agile mindset 3) Propose a methodology best suited for a given situation...

热门审阅

CP

Sep 20, 2020

Be wary of first peer reviewed assignment--requires detailed readings and not all reviewers take the time to read what you wrote or even the rubric.

SS

Apr 10, 2022

I found this course very impressive. Such amazing context is not available even on you tube. The way of presentation is outstanding and the real world examples make it perfect for anyone.

筛选依据:

401 - Software Development Processes and Methodologies 的 425 个评论(共 440 个)

创建者 Luis F P M

May 21, 2021

Excellente course

创建者 Aniket D

Sep 12, 2020

thank you so much

创建者 DALAWAI S M

Nov 1, 2020

very nice course

创建者 ishaan o

Mar 27, 2018

excellent cource

创建者 Choda M v k

Oct 8, 2021

helpful course

创建者 MAYANK R

May 2, 2020

Nice Content

创建者 施寬陞

Nov 12, 2021

No problem

创建者 Maredla G

Oct 19, 2021

Helppful

创建者 DATLA N V

Aug 30, 2021

Helpfull

创建者 Fizzah S

Aug 26, 2021

worth it

创建者 Sudhir S

May 14, 2024

masssst

创建者 Amit R Y

Oct 28, 2021

good

创建者 SRAVYA C V

Oct 22, 2021

good

创建者 SIBHI H V S 1

Jul 29, 2020

N

i

c

e

创建者 Tejaswini V

Sep 30, 2019

Good

创建者 Steve M

Feb 22, 2026

Putting 3 stars for now. Starts out great, but goes down hill when discussing software design/architecture. Too much hand waving by module 2.Overloading certain terms is fine when there is a marker to help make a distinction.But descending in to babbling pretending it 'this is all part of the art form' is ridiculous.Even real art has discipline, painting has different schools of thought and even mixing pigments and holding a brush has well defined standards. Shaping a mold has standards. To pretend that software design is some kind of 'black art' in a 'black box' is preposterous. In module 2 there are lectures and questions that basically say 'the best solution is often NOT the most popular one'. The fact that the world is so dependent on aws, microsoft, oracle pretty much proves that to be a lie. The fact that there are proven software design patterns that are used as almost a default for efficiency proves that the best solution IS IN FACT the one that is widely popular in the industry. This course is ridiculous. I wonder if I should waste my time getting to Module 3.

创建者 Taylor H

Mar 22, 2025

I found that courses 2 and 3 were better explained than courses 1 and 4. In courses 1 and 4, the topics were difficult to grasp for someone without a coding background, and the explanations were vague. Additionally, many of the resource links did not work, and I found that almost every peer assignment I was asked to review had clearly been written by AI.

创建者 addanki v v s p

Dec 18, 2020

course is good actually, but the main problem is plagiarism issues, which is so terrific. i submit my works doing for my self , but i still get the issues of error. i don't know why this system was failed in detecting the real work vs copied work

创建者 Sean S

May 30, 2023

Good material, but assignments were too easy, and most peers I had to peer review were either bots or entering nonsense submissions.

创建者 Nhat T (

Mar 11, 2019

A good enough course. Material are sometimes difficult to follow. Assignment are quite different from what were being taught.

创建者 Avanti M D

Jan 26, 2021

Course is good. But it lags in detailed description. Slide presentation is not explained in detail.

创建者 Alpish J

Apr 4, 2020

It could have been better.But it was better than what my college taught.

创建者 Neil S

Nov 17, 2017

Very repetitive and not detailed enough.

创建者 Katuri B

Oct 26, 2021

good

创建者 Sandhya P

Jun 25, 2020

Nice