学生对 University of California, Irvine 提供的 Project Management: The Basics for Success 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
RR
Jan 16, 2016
I enjoyed the overview of project management and the detailed explanations that were immediately helpful in my work. Lots of great information! Many things for me to think about over a long time
MA
Jun 14, 2020
the course really helpful for managerial level who work with big teams and different project its more into dealing with people and how to manage your team and become successful project manager
1976 - Project Management: The Basics for Success 的 2000 个评论（共 2,149 个）
创建者 S. M N H
•Dec 27, 2020
Good.
创建者 Md. S I
•Jul 20, 2020
Great
创建者 Eng.Rashwan M H
•Apr 25, 2020
great
创建者 Banmeet S
•Mar 10, 2019
Great
创建者 Jorge D
•Jul 24, 2017
great
创建者 Châu Q V
•Mar 22, 2017
great
创建者 Jorge L D G
•Jan 29, 2017
Good!
创建者 Pawan T
•Oct 18, 2024
good
创建者 Kyara V P M
•Mar 30, 2022
Good
创建者 Bharat P
•Jun 3, 2021
nice
创建者 Bhongade S N
•Aug 3, 2020
good
创建者 Sudipta R
•Jul 29, 2020
nice
创建者 aithagoni m
•Jul 28, 2020
GOOD
创建者 Nidhisshree K
•Jul 20, 2020
Good
创建者 Yahya H
•May 16, 2020
nice
创建者 AMAN T
•Apr 17, 2020
good
创建者 A K N
•May 7, 2018
good
创建者 Trangntm6
•Sep 27, 2016
Good
创建者 chenshaojia
•Feb 21, 2016
Good
创建者 Andreas C
•Sep 19, 2015
good
创建者 Adrián F B P
•Sep 2, 2020
N/A
创建者 Emilly K S d S
•Jan 20, 2020
bom
创建者 Andrew K
•Sep 28, 2015
Go
创建者 Miguel A T
•Mar 23, 2016
c
创建者 Basil S
•Sep 28, 2015
The course had many information provided and thanks for that. But there are some things I disliked and I guess by fixing them the course would become much much better.
1. The information refers to the PMBOK very often. That is good, as the PMBOK worth (must?) reading for any PM, but it is a bit difficult to understand anything while a teacher just retranslates something, from any book — especially not written by the one — with poor examples. The much better way for lecturer is to explain it by oneself, not by just staying there and repeating what I can read from my display.
2. I dislike fixating to any software. Maybe Microsoft Project is a good example, but I am sure not the only one at first, and as I am a Mac person who has personal Macbook and Mac Pro at work I am not going to use Windows only for one application. There are plenty of them these days, the same or just similar. The key is not a software itself but the methodology using in the one. The methodology is worth understanding, for sure.
3. Grammar mistakes and misprints. It looks a little strange that no one reviewed the materials: neither on Coursera (I am sure it is not so easy to review every course) nor the creators. I am highly puzzled about how it could be possible: if it is a free course for someone there are also many of those who are paying for the courses, and the courses also represent the University. How the University cannot find someone to check the mistakes before publications? (To be precise there are tiny mistakes related to headers and graphics which make the materials looks untidy).
4. Materials production is very poor in details, even for the key ones: typography, colours, thickness of the fonts and lines. There are no contrasts, no highlighting — that looks as a draft, not as a final course worth spending the time, effort and money. If there are no people available to help with producing the materials of a good quality you can ask people from trueowl inc. (the website is trueowl.com and the working email is [email protected]) to help with it. They — we, as I am member of the team — are highly concerned about educational materials and motivated to enhance the quality of the materials, even for free of charge.
Anyway I am glad I finished this course, as it gave me understanding which way should I continue with diving deeper into the theme.
Thank you!