Zòr

ổn

..

xA

💕

ok

as

-

This course made me recall the theoretical concepts, basics, fundamental principles for good programming. It also consisted of some tips by some employees of Meta, which was very useful. The course reminded us, and also introduced some more kinds of data structures, searching-sorting techniques, algorithms, and their big O notations. In short, this course taught us how to code in an optimized way, it made me prepared for any technical interview in case of general programming. but we need to learn ourselves some more relatively to the field we are going to apply for later on. Anyway, for those who aren't interested in coding, or even if so, but not having any plans to face the interview in the same year, then this course is not for them. I felt this course boring because I wasn't liking theory much, and I wasn't taking career in this field, so I didn't have interest in this, and felt heavy.

Haven't seen the knowledge consolidation with practical examples that you'd take in interviews. Other than that, the course did a great job in the introduction of DSA and what they're used for.

Ce cours est d'une performance inégalé et très bien structuré pour un apprentissage progressif

A grade course to refresh your memory in DSA and Computer Programming.

Nice course for revising basic Data Structure concepts

it could be much better if practice labs were added

C'etait vraiment tres interessant ce cours

wonderful instructors

glad that i did it

amezing

great !

rkfjrn

Super

nice

good

The course is called "coding interview preparation," and there's no coding at all. Regarding the information in the lectures themselves: it's clearly not enough to pass the interview. But this information would be useful when learning a programming language, meaning it should be at the beginning of learning programming, not at the end. Assessments: the questions are often not covered in the lectures, and there are often questions that are unclear how to answer. I then posed these questions to the AI, and it also often gave incorrect answers or reported that all the options were incorrect. How could a human answer this? You should first ask the questions from the tests to your employees and look at the percentage of correct answers, collect feedback, and then decide whether to include them.

While the course does a decent job of explaining the basics, it falls short in providing the necessary level of detail, especially when tackling such complex topics. I found the video sessions to be quite short, it would have been more beneficial if these topics were explained with greater detail and depth. Since the course's title suggests it's for 'Preparing for an Interview,' it would greatly benefit from incorporating real-world interview mockups. This hands-on approach can provide learners with practical experience and better prepare them for actual interviews. In addition to more in-depth content, practical scenarios would be a valuable addition. I believe that with these improvements, this course could be even more valuable for learners.