this one was way harder than the first

Many issues. Some where frustrating.

Jupyter or CoLab could have worked

Tough, but you will learn a lot

Major bugs in Qwiklabs tests

Достаточно начальный уровень.

The labs are not well done.

Quite a challenging course

need some advance concepts

No autonomous work

Little difficult

Scattered a bit

difficultttt

Bad IDE.

thanks

tough

Good

Well, the theory is generally well presented. But the quizzes often had questions with ambiguous answers. For example, there is a piece of code where an email address is searched for in a dictionary, and the result is returned using if and else statements. Question: What is this code an example of. There is an option to "an email search", "a try/except clause", "a try/except loop" and "an if-else loop". And the correct answer is "an if-else loop". What is an if-else loop anyway??? I know the "an if-else statement", "an if-else block", "an if-else clause", but not "an if-else loop". Also, in the question about throwing an exception, there was a strange question where it was necessary to arrange the blocks in the correct order: raise, try, except, finally. How can they be arranged correctly? The correct order is for try, except, finally, but raise is used separately from try/catch. The word catch is not mentioned at all in the options to choose from. I also didn't like the labs. It is very inconvenient to write code in the nano editor, which does not highlight the code and is open in the browser, and when you press key combinations, not only nano reacts to them, but so does the browser. And on top of all this, at the end of the lab or in the next part of the module, the full code is given (sometimes with errors). Why then bother with inventing code and writing it in an inconvenient editor, if you can just copy and paste. Also in the labs there is a problem with evaluating the result, and if you did something wrong, the system will not tell you what is wrong, but will simply say do as in the instructions.

I found that I spent a lot of time watching videos and not much time doing practical work, there was very little info to copy down other than screenshots. I had to stop after chapter 5 as I felt I wasn't learning much and go and do Dr. Chuck's Python for Everybody course then come back. He was much better at explaining how Python works (especially lists, dictionaries and tuples) and has great examples.

This course's Chapter 7 final Wiki took a long time as it wasn't explained that you shouldn't use the csv.DictWriter tool for one of one of the files despite it being suggested. I ended up going over my Wiki quota while trying to figure out the solution.

I learn a lot in this class about how to write regex, convert a Python file to csv, With blocks, loops, dictionaries. The labs done using Qwiklabs were a headache. Not only the wording made a challenge to follow, but the poor explanation made t worse. On top of that, the fact that throughout the whole class you were just told to type some code on Qwiklabs to and then being told to write your code from zero during the last assignment made it a huge challenge. Don't take me wrong, I learned a lot! But if you are going to be hands off during the class, do it little by little not at once.

While some of the contents are good for students new to the subject. There are tons of inconsistencies. The subtitles have alot of errors, in every video, you have to refer to transcript text in order to get the correct details.

codes from lecture are not available in transcription , this is just unacceptable for a programming class.

So called "cheat notes" are just web links in this module.

the final project, the python interpreter is out of date, hours was wasted troubleshooting capturing groups.

Content is overall ok and structured. The Qwiklabs exercises have been a huge disappointment. The platform was not working / stalling in many cases, especially in Firefox. I have spent days in troubleshooting and lost my motivation to complete the course. Support was really bad in that. Using something like Google Colab would have been much better.

Learned more about Python by checking out free resources online than what I got from this course. It moved so quickly on some aspects that should have received more attention and spent too much time on some aspects that were very simple and straight forward.

This part of course were really dificult for me. I think that it could be structurized much better. Some tasks were really dificult considering that there were no examples or quizes with the code. I have a felling that author does not want to make it good

The most frustrating course I have done. The labs used for the graded assignments are horrible. You either have to copy-paste everything, or if you try to figure it out yourself you get no feedback on why you are not getting points.

The videos are fine.