the scope of information is interesting and important but I think there are some important information didn't described enough

Very less number of concepts covered. I was hoping that topics like Winter, Holtz and ARIMA would be covered

I wish there were more guidance on how to use the Excel/Google Docs platform to complete some of the tasks.

Several errors on the correction of exercises, not so deep material about the statistical analysis.

Course needs to cover more number of forecasting techniques and few more practical example

very much informative and good course and instructor also good

I completed the course and do not see certification?

fair in knowledge but not enough to get a job.

Deep and detailed knowledge is expected

basic course not that much attractive

I wanted it to be in more detail

Course explained the function

Not as good as the first 2

I am being asked to give reviews of work done 2-3 years ago. This does not make sense. This course needs serious updating, otherwise, it should just be removed. Newer ways of explanation should be applied too. I was very disappointed to see a great lack of effort by some other students. The discussion section is useless because this course is so old (the entire specialisation for that matter), that it is very rare to hear any direct feedback from the professor. I think it's best to get the paid master track certificate (if possible) as it may well be of much better quality.

Basic forecasting methods are explained, but not really in detail. Peer graded assignment was tough compared to what was taught. No way to know whether we found right solution to the peer graded assignment as peers too were as ignorant as me about the case due to inadequate explanation.

Tengo la sensación de estar pagando por un curso de especialización en el que el instructor lo grabó hace unos años y realmente no hay nadie supervisando ni contestando a las preguntas

Tu calificacion no debe de depender de estudiantes. Ya que te frena el tu completar el curso.

Please revise on the submission system. The decimal places is really a headache.

there is a problem occur in week 1 to submit the quiz

The instructions over quiz could be more clear.

too difficult for begginers but useful

trop rigide, des qcm aurais été mieux

Problem with quiz week 2

Very basic

While the first two courses in the series were somewhat unorganized but still manageable, this course was by far the most frustrating and disappointing. One of the biggest issues was the lack of feedback on quizzes. You are either exactly right or completely wrong, with no explanation provided. This made it incredibly difficult to learn from mistakes and understand the correct approach. The spreadsheet presentations and assignments were not engaging enough to help absorb the material, especially when it came to formulas, which were poorly explained and often overcomplicated. There were noticeable spelling and grammar errors throughout the course, and the pop-up questions during videos felt random and out of sync with the content. Some of the assignment questions, especially those involving rounding or formula use, felt needlessly confusing and seemed to test precision over understanding. To make matters worse, several links to external articles were expired, which further limited learning opportunities. Overall, this course needs a thorough review and quality assurance check. The material feels outdated, disorganized, and unnecessarily difficult.