学生对 IBM 提供的 Generative AI: Introduction and Applications 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
RA
Oct 23, 2025
Love the in-depth discussions of utilizing GenAI in everyday applications, especially from industry experts and how they managed to use it for their own advantages
PP
Sep 9, 2024
Course is very informative & good . In terms of getting certified, you can allow us to write assignments so we can find the feedback before subscribing.
851 - Generative AI: Introduction and Applications 的 875 个评论(共 910 个)
创建者 Alberto
•Aug 25, 2025
This course provide very basic information
创建者 Manuel M P F M F
•Oct 7, 2024
Too generic. Too simple. Its a 5/10.
创建者 Santosh N
•Nov 19, 2025
Assignments were not up to the mark
创建者 Carlos A M A
•Jul 7, 2024
mejores tallerres , mayor practica
创建者 LUZ M C D
•Apr 1, 2025
Preguntas complejas
创建者 Bharat M
•May 1, 2025
dswswqdwqd3qdwqddd
创建者 Geeta J
•Jun 3, 2025
good introduction
创建者 Asanka S P
•Dec 6, 2025
It is very basic
创建者 Daniel V
•Nov 12, 2025
i can't unroll.
创建者 Matthieu V
•Jul 21, 2025
Too superficial
创建者 Saaibalaji M
•Nov 19, 2025
Good and best
创建者 Samarjit J
•Nov 18, 2025
Nonsense
创建者 Melissa B
•Jun 18, 2025
Too easy
创建者 Ramesh S
•Nov 20, 2025
nice
创建者 JACOB G
•Nov 8, 2024
bbbb
创建者 Manas D
•Feb 11, 2025
ok
创建者 Mia S
•Dec 14, 2025
I really wanted to like this course, but I didn’t :( it was really, really slow. It kept repeating the same irrelevant things over and over in different formats and I felt we made zero progress. The beginning felt like watching advertising videos. The videos in general were very superficial listing concepts that were never explained. They could have explained the concepts instead, you used super experts and the power of a super expert is that they are able to explain difficult things to a 12 yr old in one sentence. I would have wished that instead of long irrelevant lists spoken aloud. The exercises/tests were mainly testing whether you can memorise completely irrelevant things by heart, e.g. names of AI that can be used to make music or videos, but this was a course for project managers. Luckily I had taken another course with the university so I was able to apply that knowledge for some of the questions that were never explained in the course material but popped up in some of the exercise. I would have wished a lot more like that university course, really explaining the concepts behind the gen AI instead of the long lists of concepts never explained and long lists of different AIs to be memorised by heart. Also, in different uses of AI in this course for project managers I don’t remember you touching project management even once. Instead there was medicine, marketing, music, videos, pictures…..so, uselfulness for my work was quite low unfortunately :( also, Claude was never mentioned, and I find that most useful for project manager in daily work. Instead, a lot of tools for image manipulation and music were covered in many instances. So yes, I would have wished a different content for this course.
创建者 Timur A
•Dec 6, 2025
I have mixed feelings about the course. Exercises are fun, but the course didn't provide almost any new information for me. I'm working in IT so I could hear a bit of theory before the course. And I've used ChatGPT/Gemini couple of times out of curiosity. So I wouldn't say that I'm experienced with AI. There were few details that course explained but how knowing what "GPT" stands for can help me to use GenAI effectively? The course provides a lot of info, which, I think, is widely known. It provides tons of different examples of how GenAI can be used, without any details. Like, it claims that GenAI can be used in fraud prevention, but how? Instead of explaining few real-world examples, the course keeps bombarding with new and new examples. At the same time the content felt overwhelmingly repetitive, especially in the first module. I've got that GenAI can generate text the first time! I'd expect courses to be more academic, here I've heard a lot of buzz words. Reading includes duplicated paragraphs, which makes it obvious that materials were not properly revised.
创建者 Michelle T
•Jun 1, 2025
This course packed all the important information into videos and had little to no written reference material to go back to and learn from or use as a clear roadmap. As someone who does not learn well from video instructions, I found it very difficult to get the information I needed. I wish there were more written resources, especially for which LLM is best for each use and what their limitations are.
创建者 M. M L
•Sep 16, 2025
Very basic input, the questions from the quiz are very poorly made, I answered them, they were deemed wrong, I checked with Chatgpt and Chargpt agreed with my answers (!). The text is from the questions is confusing and can be interpreted in different ways. Also there is outdated data already as generative AI ia improving extremely fast. Overall an ''ok'' course for extreme beginners.
创建者 Ana B - K
•Apr 26, 2024
The videos showed too much information about too many applications in a very compressed video. Had a hard time keeping track of so many similar applications. Examples were cool. Wished it was more mobile-friendly. Hard to do the course on the go. Had to wait to get home to do this were I have too many distractions.
创建者 Mateusz K
•Mar 20, 2025
This is my OPINION: Nicely prepared material but way to outdated. Part of Lab exercises is not working (I mean in https://labs.cognitiveclass.ai) a Dall-e model(s) are not functioning (I have submitted a ticket and the problem was not solved after a few days, maybe will be later).
创建者 James W
•May 26, 2024
Unimpressed. More IBM marketing than I expected. If you want a something focused on "look at some of the neat things you can do with Generative AI in 2023" then this might be right for you.
创建者 O B
•Mar 30, 2024
كان هنالك الكثير من الكلام لكن المحتوى يجب ان يكون قليل لانه المعلومات الاساسية واضحة و معروفة لكن بدلا من التركيز عليهم كان يدور حولهم . وترجمة الاختبارات النهائية للعربية سييييئة جدا
创建者 Christoph S
•Aug 26, 2025
AI narrated slidedecks, repetitive expert interviews with strong accent, unrelated video and image filling material. tests are too easy (purpose?). low learning per time ratio