学生对 California Institute of the Arts 提供的 Fundamentals of Graphic Design 的评价和反馈
课程概述
热门审阅
CS
May 9, 2018
An ok course for beginners. A bit too basic for someone who has already had experience in design, but is great anyway cause it breaks things back down to the simplest parts to help you remember roots.
EJ
Sep 5, 2021
I had a lot of fun in this course. I learnt some extra bits of information related to graphic design and I think it's a great start for beginners as well as good practice for intermediate and experts!
4601 - Fundamentals of Graphic Design 的 4625 个评论（共 4,674 个）
创建者 Ivy T
•Jul 30, 2020
Looks a bit outdated. A bit boring
创建者 Jordan
•May 31, 2019
Could use a few updated changes.
创建者 Lulu
•Feb 11, 2016
lecturer could be more personal
创建者 Dixit U
•Nov 17, 2020
avarage course not preferable.
创建者 Dean C
•Oct 22, 2017
Good but very beginner level.
创建者 Natalia K
•Dec 29, 2015
It is good for beginners only
创建者 Remington C
•Dec 7, 2015
Bit too simple for my liking.
创建者 Ieva
•Oct 3, 2020
the lessons were very basic
创建者 Semih S
•Dec 27, 2020
For 4 week course its ok.
创建者 Kenneth D D
•Jul 26, 2020
Only very basic concepts.
创建者 Afia T 2
•Aug 31, 2020
A enjoyable course😃
创建者 Fernanda C M H
•Nov 5, 2024
no tan entretenido
创建者 German G S
•May 7, 2020
Pretty Interesting
创建者 Muhammad F K
•Jun 26, 2020
Good. not deep.
创建者 Dongqi L
•May 29, 2019
too fundamental
创建者 radhvi k
•Jun 24, 2019
simply.. Wow.!
创建者 Geffania G G
•Jul 30, 2020
It was Good.
创建者 Claudel R
•Sep 17, 2023
Very basic!
创建者 Fahimul H T
•Nov 28, 2025
simple
创建者 Nusanta S A
•Sep 28, 2020
good
创建者 Silvana L A C
•Jun 14, 2020
Good
创建者 Ada S
•Sep 11, 2024
***
创建者 Richard L
•Aug 5, 2020
The course itself was very good. I studied for many more hours than the recommended times and I learned a lot. I read books about Bauhaus, color, and typography. I watched a film about Bauhaus and did an online course by Pantone about color perception. The thing that lets the course down is the peer reviews, which are mostly useless. I've tried hard to write thoughtful reviews and I've done more than the minimum number for every assignment. In return I've received reviews like "ok" and "good". These people are just taking the mickey and CalArts and Coursera are responsible by neglect. It would be easy to automatically check for a minimum number of words in reviews. I notice that Gail Swanlund gives guidance about how to review in the Imagemaking course, but shouldn't this be in the first course so people know how to review? There ought to be a way to report these non-reviews and the people should be stripped of their course marks.
创建者 Lisa T
•Mar 7, 2016
This course does go over some of the basics of graphic design, but I expected it to be a lot more rigorous. The assignments are incredibly simple, and I think that there should be no optional assignments in the class. The reason I'm taking this class is because I have a hard time motivating myself to learn on my own, so I need something that will really push me. I only spent about an hour a week completing this course, and I believe that you can't learn something by only spending an hour a week on it. Also what's the point of having mentors if they don't engage with you? I know I could have contacted them if I had a question, but I didn't because it was so easy. I wouldn't mind getting feedback from a professional graphic designer though if they're available. Also seeing how many students misinterpret the assignments, it makes me nervous that they are the ones grading mine.
创建者 Svante B
•Nov 21, 2024
The information is good and the teacher knowledgeable, which is very important. The course material however, looks very dated. You can do a better job shooting this on a phone today. Also the peer graded assignments (all assignments where you have to create something in the course are peer graded), are a bit of a joke. People go in and give whatever rating they want and then spam one word as motivation. Then you're stuck with that grade.