Chevron Left
返回到 Programming Mobile Applications for Android Handheld Systems: Part 1

学生对 University of Maryland, College Park 提供的 Programming Mobile Applications for Android Handheld Systems: Part 1 的评价和反馈

4.6
684 个评分

课程概述

This course introduces you to the design and implementation of Android applications for mobile devices. You will develop an app from scratch, assuming a basic knowledge of Java, and learn how to set up Android Studio, work with various Activities and create simple user interfaces to make your apps run smoothly....

热门审阅

RD

Aug 18, 2016

I give 4 stars instead 5 just because the last assignments, building an app from scratch, should me more interesting and useful

DJ

Jul 26, 2017

Excellent teacher and excellent course. Concepts are well explained as difficulty gradually increases

筛选依据:

176 - Programming Mobile Applications for Android Handheld Systems: Part 1 的 191 个评论(共 191 个)

创建者 Yuriy S ( T

Aug 22, 2018

not bad course, but i think its not enough information about Android OS, need to improve.

创建者 Manasa R

Sep 14, 2016

I like this programme its very helpful and encouraging for me to do programming

创建者 Hoa D

Nov 29, 2016

i like this

创建者 Sergey A

Oct 31, 2017

Course automatic notification system informed me to finish assignments until XXXXXX date. Assignments were submitted in time, but, anyway, didn't grade.

Notification and checking systems needed to be revised, bugs need to be fixed.

I will never buy certificates in Coursera, because from this time no trust to this service.

The course is very good. But first assignments a difficult to be done, more learning materials needed.

Anyway, the most important thing I got is knowledge, that is priceless

创建者 Mick C

Jul 23, 2016

I found this course lacking in providing sufficient coverage of the basics in the course videos and lacking a useful and directed reading list. I spent far too much time researching command syntax and using try and error to find what worked with the provided code.

Disappointing as topics covered are good.

创建者 Ali A

Mar 31, 2017

the course is a bit outdated and I am finding it hard to stay motivated knowing there are other more recent courses. The topics I think are still relevant but the tools are not. I am looking for courses where there is hands on development that you follow with the instructor and I did not find this here.

创建者 Anurag D

Sep 22, 2016

A basic course but not for the ones who don't know anything about java or android. Not made for the beginners. Also the submitting projects work is complicated and should be made more easier.

Not recommended for the starter.

创建者 Krizia B

Jun 27, 2016

Very fast pace with no support. Be prepared to make countless online searches or to discuss solely with peers. Many drop out by the end of the course. Final Project is far too difficult for this course, because it did not prepare me at all. If you want to learn Android programming, I suggest you look elsewhere.

创建者 Dave M

Apr 26, 2016

I was disappointed in the lack of explanation for the tools. Since everything depends on the IDE, and there was no instruction about the IDE, I found it difficult to do the labs. In the course of trying to, the IDE somehow managed to corrupt my hard drive. After that I pretty much lost interest in the course.

创建者 Doug B

Apr 16, 2017

Online grader for labs is terribly buggy. Attempted submitting labs several occasions - all fail. Local builds work fine with apps working as expected and tests pass. The online builder gives very little feedback other than "BuidError". £40 wasted. Will not recommend and will never fall for it again. AVOID!

创建者 Angel D E B

Sep 11, 2023

Este curso está muy desactualizado, los proyectos no funcionan en nuevas versiones de android studio. Me gusta la teoría pero la practica es obsoleta

创建者 Deleted A

Jul 10, 2017

The content is very good and useful but way he talks it makes me fall asleep.

创建者 Todd K

Mar 29, 2020

Course is out-of-date and examples often do not work.

创建者 Ricardo L

Jan 21, 2025

Not updated to current versions

创建者 Islam S A

Sep 27, 2017

it's to bad course